I really like it - Analyst Mathematica Employee Review

4.0
Feb 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Quick promotion, great work life balance, good mission and values, interesting project work, intelligent colleagues

Cons

I get the sense my experience here isn’t the same as others. If you preform beyond expectations and have coworkers who advocate for you, you’ll be off cycle or on cycle promoted rather quickly (i was off cycle promoted at exactly a year of being here…). If you are good at your job, you’ll consistently get good merit increases. The truth is that the current administration hurt our portfolio of work, it’ll take time to rebuild and a lot of that is out of the companies hands (others in the industry experienced the EXACT same thing). CEO has put immense pressure on AI, it is genuinely all he talks about, which is annoying but I also understand why.. we need to be competitive in this market. Coworkers need to understand that the business is changing, and Mathematica is just trying to keep up and evolve. I feel they are as transparent as they can be.

Explore other reviews about Mathematica

5.0
Apr 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great colleagues, 401k match, and interesting work

Cons

Work life balance could be improved and more ability to move between departments

3.0
Jun 29, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart people, impactful work. A real community.

Cons

Poor strategic planning. Rather than performing real analysis and proactive thinking, leadership reacts to the environment. Strategy development and implementation at Mathematica seems like leadership throws wet spaghetti against the wall to see what sticks. In the 2010s, it was predictive modeling. Rather than proactively using predictive modeling to support their client's goals and the organization's mission, they created a data analytics division, hired smart people, and provided no guidance to support the division. Today, AI has replaced predictive modeling. These examples provide two instances of failures of corporate leadership; many more exist. Unfortunately, the company suffers from short-term incentives and an aversion to long-term investments. As an employee-owned company, you would think that the board and leadership would be more responsive to the employees. No! Over time, they have removed employees' voices from decision-making and focused on increasing their own power and independence.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All