Good environment for research but room for improvement - Researcher Mathematica Employee Review

4.0
Feb 15, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Very pleasant and friendly work environment - Extremely smart and talented colleagues - Dedication to high-quality work - Many opportunities on interesting projects - Flexible attitude to work schedule and telecommuting - Generous compensation and benefits

Cons

- Can be a high stress environment at times, especially when deadlines coincide - Usually more than the 40 hours a week that are advertised. Work on weekends is rare, but work at nights (from home) is common - Senior research and management staff often ignore emails from junior staff, and it can be hard to get help when you are stuck on something. - Large variation in quality of project directors. - Incompetent support staff (accounting, IT, secretaries, etc). Not good enough for the 21st century. - Can be thrifty. Computers are a decade out of date, office chairs are bottom of the range, and accounting will argue over a few cents when processing reimbursements

Explore other reviews about Mathematica

5.0
Apr 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great colleagues, 401k match, and interesting work

Cons

Work life balance could be improved and more ability to move between departments

3.0
Jun 29, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart people, impactful work. A real community.

Cons

Poor strategic planning. Rather than performing real analysis and proactive thinking, leadership reacts to the environment. Strategy development and implementation at Mathematica seems like leadership throws wet spaghetti against the wall to see what sticks. In the 2010s, it was predictive modeling. Rather than proactively using predictive modeling to support their client's goals and the organization's mission, they created a data analytics division, hired smart people, and provided no guidance to support the division. Today, AI has replaced predictive modeling. These examples provide two instances of failures of corporate leadership; many more exist. Unfortunately, the company suffers from short-term incentives and an aversion to long-term investments. As an employee-owned company, you would think that the board and leadership would be more responsive to the employees. No! Over time, they have removed employees' voices from decision-making and focused on increasing their own power and independence.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All