No room to learn! Don't work here!! - Research Analyst Mathematica Employee Review

1.0
Jan 8, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are some great project managers and PIs who care and give opportunities to learn and grow. However, I didn't come across many.

Cons

-Little opportunity to learn. Most analysts have responsibilities that are below their ability level and getting challenging work is about your luck (being in the right project at the right time – usually when the budget doesn’t allow senior folks to do the work.) So people with Masters degree’s may be stuck writing the intro to proposals for or taking meeting notes for years on end. -Hierarchical structure. It’s a toss up on if analysts are invited to project meetings or are just given instructions without context later on. If analysts are at meetings, it is rare for them to feel like they are able to speak out. -Company culture is sad. Calling someone who sits down the hall from you is just depressing. Wake up people! Humans are social beings and the office culture needs a revamp!

Explore other reviews about Mathematica

5.0
Apr 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great colleagues, 401k match, and interesting work

Cons

Work life balance could be improved and more ability to move between departments

3.0
Jun 29, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart people, impactful work. A real community.

Cons

Poor strategic planning. Rather than performing real analysis and proactive thinking, leadership reacts to the environment. Strategy development and implementation at Mathematica seems like leadership throws wet spaghetti against the wall to see what sticks. In the 2010s, it was predictive modeling. Rather than proactively using predictive modeling to support their client's goals and the organization's mission, they created a data analytics division, hired smart people, and provided no guidance to support the division. Today, AI has replaced predictive modeling. These examples provide two instances of failures of corporate leadership; many more exist. Unfortunately, the company suffers from short-term incentives and an aversion to long-term investments. As an employee-owned company, you would think that the board and leadership would be more responsive to the employees. No! Over time, they have removed employees' voices from decision-making and focused on increasing their own power and independence.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All