Great mission, nice work environment, but compensation lags - Research Analyst Mathematica Employee Review

4.0
Jan 11, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mathematica is full of intelligent and kind people, many of whom seem to genuinely care about their jobs. It is an mission driven and employee-owned company so there is rarely any tension between employee well-being and corporate profit margins. The research portfolio is wide-ranging and employees are encouraged to involve themselves in different topics and methodologies. The company provides ample room for growth for junior employees.

Cons

Mathematica charges its client a high rate, which means there is a lot of pressure to deliver excellent research products within the budget. It's common for junior staff to put in well over 40 hours per week, but this effort usually goes unacknowledged. Compensation seems low considering the length of the workweek and level of education required. Mathematica leadership talks a good game about DEI, but every hiring wave seems to fall short of our stated values.

Explore other reviews about Mathematica

5.0
Apr 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great colleagues, 401k match, and interesting work

Cons

Work life balance could be improved and more ability to move between departments

3.0
Jun 29, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart people, impactful work. A real community.

Cons

Poor strategic planning. Rather than performing real analysis and proactive thinking, leadership reacts to the environment. Strategy development and implementation at Mathematica seems like leadership throws wet spaghetti against the wall to see what sticks. In the 2010s, it was predictive modeling. Rather than proactively using predictive modeling to support their client's goals and the organization's mission, they created a data analytics division, hired smart people, and provided no guidance to support the division. Today, AI has replaced predictive modeling. These examples provide two instances of failures of corporate leadership; many more exist. Unfortunately, the company suffers from short-term incentives and an aversion to long-term investments. As an employee-owned company, you would think that the board and leadership would be more responsive to the employees. No! Over time, they have removed employees' voices from decision-making and focused on increasing their own power and independence.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All