PTO benefits are severely lacking. - Analyst Mathematica Employee Review

3.0
Jun 19, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Colleagues are smart, supportive and kind. I honestly think it would be challenging to find similar at other companies doing the same type of work with the same client base. That is what has kept me here so far.

Cons

But I've been strongly considering leaving as of late. I'm a younger, childless employee that really enjoys traveling. However, the PTO benefits here are not good at all. We essentially work ~240 days for 21 days of PTO. There are no separate buckets like other companies (sick, personal, vacation, etc.). We just have one PTO bucket and 8 holidays. I know I'm not alone in how I feel about the PTO. Many of my friends here (in their 20s and early 30s) feel the same. Since most of leadership are 40/50+ with children, it doesn't seem to be an issue for them, so improving the PTO benefits is not something they are considering. Doesn't seem like many of my older full-time colleagues travel much and when they do, they are perfectly fine with working/"checking in" while vacationing. With 21 PTO days, the company is essentially making us choose between true self-care days and planning for unpredictable sick days (the anxiety around getting COVID and having to take valuable PTO days to recover is REAL). Self-care is mental and physical health and we're not getting adequate self-care with 3 weeks vacation for a year of work. It's sad because I really like this company for other reasons.

Explore other reviews about Mathematica

5.0
Apr 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great colleagues, 401k match, and interesting work

Cons

Work life balance could be improved and more ability to move between departments

3.0
Jun 29, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart people, impactful work. A real community.

Cons

Poor strategic planning. Rather than performing real analysis and proactive thinking, leadership reacts to the environment. Strategy development and implementation at Mathematica seems like leadership throws wet spaghetti against the wall to see what sticks. In the 2010s, it was predictive modeling. Rather than proactively using predictive modeling to support their client's goals and the organization's mission, they created a data analytics division, hired smart people, and provided no guidance to support the division. Today, AI has replaced predictive modeling. These examples provide two instances of failures of corporate leadership; many more exist. Unfortunately, the company suffers from short-term incentives and an aversion to long-term investments. As an employee-owned company, you would think that the board and leadership would be more responsive to the employees. No! Over time, they have removed employees' voices from decision-making and focused on increasing their own power and independence.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All