Great people and work, terrible executive structure and benefits - Researcher Mathematica Employee Review

3.0
Jan 6, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

++ Incredibly smart and kind colleagues. ++ Interesting and meaningful project work spanning a variety of topic areas, clients, and research methods. ++ Great place for people with initiative and enthusiasm who are willing to try new tasks and research methods. ++Work from home and flex time is great, and won't be going away.

Cons

--"Employee ownership" is a buzzword; employees have no real power. Everything is top-down, with occasional opportunities to provide unactionable feedback. --Culture has become hostile, putting profit over people, starting with the CEO and extending through the E suite. Company is resistant to meaningful change (aside from countless reorgs). -- Executives are overpaid at the expense of junior and mid-level staff. -- Despite being a majority woman company, women are underrepresented in leadership (compared to the rest of the company), and parental leave is abysmal. -- Disappointing benefits (specifically PTO and family leave).

Explore other reviews about Mathematica

5.0
Apr 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great colleagues, 401k match, and interesting work

Cons

Work life balance could be improved and more ability to move between departments

3.0
Jun 29, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart people, impactful work. A real community.

Cons

Poor strategic planning. Rather than performing real analysis and proactive thinking, leadership reacts to the environment. Strategy development and implementation at Mathematica seems like leadership throws wet spaghetti against the wall to see what sticks. In the 2010s, it was predictive modeling. Rather than proactively using predictive modeling to support their client's goals and the organization's mission, they created a data analytics division, hired smart people, and provided no guidance to support the division. Today, AI has replaced predictive modeling. These examples provide two instances of failures of corporate leadership; many more exist. Unfortunately, the company suffers from short-term incentives and an aversion to long-term investments. As an employee-owned company, you would think that the board and leadership would be more responsive to the employees. No! Over time, they have removed employees' voices from decision-making and focused on increasing their own power and independence.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All