Hard to stay - Researcher Mathematica Employee Review

1.0
Mar 28, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

As others have said: great people. And this is important, because this place recruits smart wonderful colleagues, people that are truly brilliant and, when they're not directing a project, are the best humans to have as colleagues you'll ever find.

Cons

You have to take the good with the bad. For some, the bad is too much. For others these points may not be that bad. 1. This place breeds micromanagement. The processes are specifically designed to take out all critical thinking and ownership. But, if you get a manager/project director willing to go against "the Mathematica Way" you can have a really rich experience. Goes back to the ultimate strength of Mathematica is the people, not the processes or internal methods. As a result, people with strong capabilities have their growth stunted by a really bad project management ethos and because of overincentivizing adherance to the Mathematica Way. 2. It is impossible to respect senior leadership. The CEO lies and then when he's called out, he fires the staff, yells at them, or has HR intervene to downgrade their performance review. He talks about the "Mission" but anyone who has worked at a mission-oriented company can see that this is lip service. The subterfuge is demoralizing. 3. It's every person for themselves (depending on the technical area). It's just a fact that you have to look out for yourself. Looking out for the good of the team, unit, or company will only lose you nights and weekends while the senior execs pocket all that revenue you just generated.

Explore other reviews about Mathematica

5.0
Apr 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great colleagues, 401k match, and interesting work

Cons

Work life balance could be improved and more ability to move between departments

3.0
Jun 29, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart people, impactful work. A real community.

Cons

Poor strategic planning. Rather than performing real analysis and proactive thinking, leadership reacts to the environment. Strategy development and implementation at Mathematica seems like leadership throws wet spaghetti against the wall to see what sticks. In the 2010s, it was predictive modeling. Rather than proactively using predictive modeling to support their client's goals and the organization's mission, they created a data analytics division, hired smart people, and provided no guidance to support the division. Today, AI has replaced predictive modeling. These examples provide two instances of failures of corporate leadership; many more exist. Unfortunately, the company suffers from short-term incentives and an aversion to long-term investments. As an employee-owned company, you would think that the board and leadership would be more responsive to the employees. No! Over time, they have removed employees' voices from decision-making and focused on increasing their own power and independence.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All