Used to be great, but leadership is killing it - Researcher Mathematica Employee Review

1.0
Apr 23, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

World class peer colleagues committed to excellence (albeit despite tanking morale)

Cons

Where to start… - amid large federal funding cuts that have prompted MPR to layoff several hundred staff, leadership has deemed it appropriate to give bonuses to executives (which historically have amounted to hundreds of thousands of dollars). - They were willfully blind and woefully unprepared for the new administration, with the CEO even outright denying that anything would change in late January, and since then gaslighting staff by saying they’d been preparing for months. They began an unnecessary and costly internal restructuring which has added multiple expensive senior positions, which they have continued pursuing while having to layoff staff due to lack of funds. - They imposed a draconian communications policy limiting what staff can say even on their personal social media platforms. After one staff member asked leadership to explain this policy and voiced disappointment, they were let go. - They have gone out of their way to be as non transparent as possible. Staff who had been members of certain minority-oriented employee resource groups have been instructed not to speak or ask questions in company meetings. They have shut down chats in virtual meetings so they are not forced to see staff’s comments. And they consistently end staff meetings early while never taking questions. - When many staff were reeling and afraid they of the current administration’s attack LGBTQ+ folks, Mathematica preemptively disbanded all employee resource groups and instructed staff to remove pronouns from their emails. - They are hiring lobbyists to curry favor with republican lawmakers (again, while laying off staff due to lack of funds). - After years of encouraging staff to invest their retirement funds in the employee stock plan, the stock price is now falling. So, leadership has changed the rules to prevent staff from withdrawing their funds, and instead are requiring it to be paid in installments over 5 years (effectively trapping people’s money in a tanking fund). This change was made without consultation. In sum, it feels like I and our wonderful colleagues have been trapped in a fun house where the clowns at the top are getting richer and richer at the expense of the morale and ultimately the livelihoods of the rest of the staff.

Explore other reviews about Mathematica

5.0
Apr 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great colleagues, 401k match, and interesting work

Cons

Work life balance could be improved and more ability to move between departments

3.0
Jun 29, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart people, impactful work. A real community.

Cons

Poor strategic planning. Rather than performing real analysis and proactive thinking, leadership reacts to the environment. Strategy development and implementation at Mathematica seems like leadership throws wet spaghetti against the wall to see what sticks. In the 2010s, it was predictive modeling. Rather than proactively using predictive modeling to support their client's goals and the organization's mission, they created a data analytics division, hired smart people, and provided no guidance to support the division. Today, AI has replaced predictive modeling. These examples provide two instances of failures of corporate leadership; many more exist. Unfortunately, the company suffers from short-term incentives and an aversion to long-term investments. As an employee-owned company, you would think that the board and leadership would be more responsive to the employees. No! Over time, they have removed employees' voices from decision-making and focused on increasing their own power and independence.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All