Stable job, good compensation but unimaginative management and company culture - Researcher I Mathematica Employee Review

2.0
Jun 13, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mathematica has good pay and benefits and there is a general respect for work life balance. Employees are usually assigned their own office. Researchers are skilled in their policy areas. Opportunity to work across different policy areas if desired. In general the job is stable

Cons

A) Poor communication from management about (1) basic polices and procedures; (2) issues being considered; and (3) decisions. There is a general feeling from senior staff of doing things as they have always been done rather than thinking outside the box or innovating. B) Very little diversity from underrepresented minorities and no push from management to increase it. C) Staff are usually nice but not necessarily open minded or self aware D) Lackluster company culture: very few company programs targeted at building community and supporting staff in the work environment. No professional development plan and few professional development opportunities. E) Many senior staff have been at the company a long time but there is more turnover than some would admit

Explore other reviews about Mathematica

5.0
Apr 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great colleagues, 401k match, and interesting work

Cons

Work life balance could be improved and more ability to move between departments

3.0
Jun 29, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart people, impactful work. A real community.

Cons

Poor strategic planning. Rather than performing real analysis and proactive thinking, leadership reacts to the environment. Strategy development and implementation at Mathematica seems like leadership throws wet spaghetti against the wall to see what sticks. In the 2010s, it was predictive modeling. Rather than proactively using predictive modeling to support their client's goals and the organization's mission, they created a data analytics division, hired smart people, and provided no guidance to support the division. Today, AI has replaced predictive modeling. These examples provide two instances of failures of corporate leadership; many more exist. Unfortunately, the company suffers from short-term incentives and an aversion to long-term investments. As an employee-owned company, you would think that the board and leadership would be more responsive to the employees. No! Over time, they have removed employees' voices from decision-making and focused on increasing their own power and independence.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All