Great colleagues and benefits, but unrealistic expectations persist - Senior Lab Assistant NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital Employee Review

3.0
Jul 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1 - There are many great people throughout the hospital enterprise. Most staff members and faculty are willing to do their part to provide the best available patient care. 2 - There are many available benefits. This includes medical, dental, 403B pension plan, and tuition reimbursement towards continued learning.

Cons

1 - While teamwork is promoted and everyone is to do their fair share, in reality, the heavy lifting is expected to be done by the staff, mainly the lowest ranking. There is great amount of tribalism throughout the hospital enterprise, even within certain subareas. 2 - Potential career growth is limited to certain areas. The paths are clearly defined for MDs and nursing roles. There is little to no mentoring outside of these two fields. 3 - Unrealistic staff expectations. Rolling layoffs have occurred during the last couple of years and "do more with less" is the current expectation. Changes are being made without truly addressing how they will impact the staff. Some members from the management team are not open to criticism. If you speak up about these new additional responsibilities, you get push back. Your concerns are dismissed. They view you as either being lazy or difficult. In some cases, they take it as a personal attack. This can also affect your performance review. 4 - Lower staff pay in comparison to other hospitals.

Explore other reviews about NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital

5.0
Jul 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Competitive pay Great team Support for PAs

Cons

Schedule - not given in apple advanced time

2.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great benefits and compensation package. When department management is supportive and aligns with the clinical team, it creates an outstanding work environment.

Cons

2 months into my employment management team subjected me to a highly adversarial and intimidating review meeting characterized by an extreme imbalance of power, with three superiors pressuring me without any independent support. Throughout the discussion, leadership relied on arbitrary, unestablished performance standards and weaponized isolated workflow examples to issue severe threats regarding my job security and professional license. Management completely dismissed my years of proven clinical experience and excellent historical( 4 years w/Cornell ) reviews, choosing instead to focus entirely on negativity, nitpicking, and policing my body language. Furthermore, they aggressively devalued my professional dedication to late-day patient safety while simultaneously stripping away my overtime compensation rights. Ultimately, the meeting was cut off abruptly and unprofessionally without a conclusion, leaving a clear and distinct impression of targeted age discrimination aimed at forcing a voluntary resignation.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All