Toxic Cross-Departmental Issues with No Real HR Action - Relationship Manager Paymentus Employee Review

1.0
Apr 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I worked in Account Management and genuinely enjoyed working with my clients and my direct managers. We had a strong, collaborative team that made meaningful progress in meeting client needs. The role offered good client interaction and a sense of accomplishment when we could deliver results.

Cons

The biggest challenge was at the leadership and cross-departmental level. There were clear plans discussed to deliver a higher level of dedicated support for our largest clients — something the business clearly required — yet meaningful progress felt stalled. Client referrals remained low, and extra proactive efforts in this area could have made a significant difference. A key structural issue was that a leader from a completely different department (Implementation) reported to the same executive overseeing Account Management. This created complications, as that individual appeared to have strong personal connections higher up in the organization. As a result, the Account Management leadership seemed limited in their ability to address ongoing cross-functional problems. This dynamic contributed to repeated unprofessional behavior, such as raised voices toward team members and managers, interruptions during client calls, and inappropriate Slack and email communications. These issues were reported multiple times, including through recent Glassdoor reviews that described similar abusive and toxic behavior. However, the responses from HR were consistently generic, copy-and-paste style replies that did not acknowledge the specific concerns or indicate any concrete actions being taken. This pattern left the impression that disruptive conduct went unchecked, despite multiple employees raising it. Additionally, while the company actively promoted its DEI program, one department stood out as lacking diversity — both in team composition and leadership — which appeared inconsistent with the organization's stated values. Overall, the lack of accountability and ineffective handling of these leadership and cultural issues by senior management and the CEO created a declining work environment. I ultimately chose to leave because the ongoing absence of resolution made it unsustainable.

avatar
Paymentus Response
2mo
We greatly appreciate your feedback regarding your work experience at the company. We encourage all employees to share their feedback about their work experience with their manager. We are committed to continuous improvement in all areas including leadership, communication, and culture and strive to continuously improve communications and growth opportunities within our organizations.

Explore other reviews about Paymentus

5.0
May 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great work life balance, and care for it's employees.

Cons

Sometimes having to work weekends, but sometimes you have to put in those extra hours to get things done.

avatar
Paymentus Response
1mo
Thank you for your feedback. We are thrilled to hear that you are enjoying the work-life balance that is a standard part of our company culture. We also thank you for your dedicated service over the last year!
1.0
Apr 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Exposure to complex client environments

Cons

Leadership communication can feel dismissive and inconsistently supportive. There are concerns around fairness in how opportunities and expectations are applied, with perceived favoritism in certain areas. Career growth is unclear, with limited visibility into progression paths. Open communication can feel discouraged, which impacts transparency and feedback. The environment can feel siloed, with uneven alignment across teams and at times a competitive or fragmented dynamic rather than consistent collaboration. The role was originally presented as remote, but this changed abruptly to a mandatory in-office requirement with very short notice. This created significant challenges for employees who had been hired under remote expectations or who were not based close to the office. After this change, there was increased emphasis on monitoring in-office attendance (e.g., badge/fob tracking) rather than focusing on output or work quality. This contributed to a perception of surveillance over trust-based performance management. In-office attendance was also perceived to be linked to performance outcomes such as bonuses or job security, which increased pressure during the transition. Escalation and issue resolution processes often felt focused on assigning blame rather than resolving root causes, making it harder to raise issues or get support. Work expectations frequently extended beyond standard working hours, impacting work-life balance and creating an expectation of constant availability.

2
avatar
Paymentus Response
2mo
While we are sorry to hear that your personal experience did not meet expectations, your candid response is invaluable in helping us achieve a culture of continuous improvement. As our global team continues to grow, we remain committed to building a culture that all employees can be proud of.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All