Toxic Culture; Unethical Company - Remote Support Tech RST Support.com Employee Review

1.0
Aug 2, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pay is *technically* above minimum wage, and there *are* benefits available to full-timers. They're a little pricey but worth it IMO; Flex accounts are an option as well. 401k is available BUT no company match so pfffft you're better off buying crypto and hodling. Work from home is awesome, but that's not really unique to this company, especially as WFH continues to become more commonplace in general. I worked there almost three years and in the beginning the job was still Tier 2 support for a major US Internet provider AND employees were provided (more or less) adequate tools to do their jobs - you know, fix the service people were paying big bucks for on a monthly basis. It wasn't perfect but then, nothing is; I was proud to be a part of what we did because we were allowed to help everyday people with often limited technical abilities to get back up and going as quickly as possible with minimal inconvenience or risk of incurring extra charges. What happened? Well, keep reading....

Cons

No raises - literally every time that was brought up to management in my presence, the person posing the question was laughed at heartily and told if you want a raise, get another job (inside or outside) the company. There *are* "pay for performance" incentives but the way they are calculated, while proprietary and closely guarded with respect to specifics, is always being adjusted without warning or explanation (I won't go into how I know this, but anyone paying attention to their daily stats will notice wild fluctuations in rank that simply don't make sense unless the algorithms computing rank are being toyed around with). Handle time is by far the most influential of the stats that determine who is ranked highest, incentivizing getting rid of a customer ASAP versus providing them with the best, most complete fix within one's ability. Booo! QA is virtually meaningless as of 9 months ago or so. I resigned myself to only ever scoring a max of 50/100 (used to ace them almost always, never was given decent guidance on this once rules changed, and neither were any coworkers with whom I spoke on the topic; didn't matter much, since they made it weigh so much less in the overall computation anyway, I could still score straight 50% on QA for a month and hit bonus-able rank anyhow). How did I do this? Well, it's easy. They reworked what tools were available to us (read: we went from "somewhat technical" (in an entry-level-configure-your-router-using-its-gui-config-tool) simple, but relatively powerful and direct way of being able to diagnose and resolve issues to the dumbed-down kiddie read-from-a-script-and-let-it-guess-what-is-wrong way of being able to...well, do very, very little except burn the customer's time and break the news that they will need a service call which "might" cost $60. Gone are the days that an RST can fix things as an SDC employee. Now, they are simply generating largely unneccessary 60 dollar technician fees for the provider rhyming with ROMblast. Did I mention that the max amount we can refund for improperly charged technician fees - yes, legitimately improper, as in, it was an issue on the ISP's infrastructure, not the customer's fault but they got a $60 hit anyway - is $20? So your hands are tied, you have to recommend the service call, their hands are tied if they want the service they're already paying for, so they go "alright I GUESS", they call back once issue is determined to be one they did NOT cause in order to contest this $60 fee they don't really owe, and you can apologize and refund ONE THIRD of the money and not a penny more? I'm sorry, that's outright theft. SDC knowingly participates in this. If you try to assist the customer by being honest, have another job lined up, because they will simply change your passwords and send an email to the last email address they have on file that's a non-work address. don't expect a conversation with your boss. Mine acted like it was all rosy straight through my termination, never gave me a verbal or written warning, nothing, nada, zilch. I literally received a pay-for-performance bonus payout on the check that was direct deposited into my account the same week of my termination. I wasn't even ever given a reason for said termination, just sent a PDF "termination" packet. It's getting worse and worse over there too, almost everyone with any technical knowhow has jumped ship, and they're losing the few supervisors they did have that displayed any level of competence or had any people skills or personality whatsoever just as quickly. Did I mention that they have absolutely zero redundancy built into their pathetic network? OOOHH yeah buddy - when an SDC tool tanks, you can bet they all tank at once. All eggs in one basket - a shoddily crafted, rickety, pathetic basket. The sooner this company tanks entirely, the better, no one at the helm deserves to do anything but sink with this ship. Not a one.

avatar
Support.com Response
7y
We value the comments of the individual, however, they are not quite accurate. We are an organization who has changed as our industry changes, and with change comes some degree of unrest with tenured employees. We strive as an organization to prepare our employees for change, however, as much as we educate and update our employees, some do not understand the change in industry or chose not to accept this change – and we understand. The role is not for everyone; it is more customer centric, more guided and less free-flowing. But, as has always been the case our employees are our number one concern, and all efforts to improve are based upon feedback from our employees. • We are a pay for performance organization, so it is correct our hourly rate has not changed, however our P4P changes due to changes in our business, and more opportunities arise for P4P payouts • We never rely on just one metric, nor is Average Handle Time our main metric. However, this is important to our clients and our customers; efficient resolution • Our clients’ needs have changed over the years, as have our roles in the support industry. Newer tools provide us with new opportunities to assist the customer in a less technical manner • QA is equally important, as our customers deserve to be treated in a professional and efficient manner. Our QA goals are industry standard, with a high emphasis on customer satisfaction • Our tools allow for guided paths, one of the most effective ways to diagnose common problems. Those problems outside of scope are still researched by our technical “gurus”, of which we are very proud of their technical prowess • Our goal on each and every call is to avoid a “truck roll”. It is the role of the RST to provide technical support to resolve customer issues, NOT send a technician to the residence • The only time an employee is relieved of his/her duties without going through our progressive disciplinary action process, is IF the employee participates in gross misconduct behaviors that jeopardize our customers or clients. We do escalate these situations to Final Written Warning or separation depending upon the egregious nature of the situation • No employee is terminated without a thorough review of his/her action. All employees are completely aware of any disciplinary actions taken or the reason for his/her separation from our organization. We are committed to work with each employee when issues arise to ensure we are thorough in our review, giving our employees every opportunity to explain the situation • Our supervisor pool has increased, not decreased. We are proud of our supervisors and ensure they have the training they need to be successful • We have many roles and opportunities for advancement, it is up to the individual employee to seek these advancement opportunities out and show us their desire to move forward in the company, we want all of our employees to advance if that is their desire. Each role has a different pay scale, so compensation advancement exists in all roles Thank you for your feedback.

Explore other reviews about Support.com

5.0
Jan 16, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Steady work and good work schedules

Cons

Poor pay increases for many except the top performers.

4.0
May 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

When I worked there there was competitive pay and benefits. Good at hiring excellent staff. Fun staff events. Good leadership.

Cons

The business product transitioned into a services related product. Not very exciting

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All