Great Culture - Anonymous employee UnityPoint Health Employee Review

5.0
Apr 9, 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Leadership is awesome, benefits are awesome, the company as a whole actually cares for it's employees, and the pay is decent. I've never felt so fulfilled in a company.

Cons

Communication can be rough because it's such a big company. Also, while it is accessible for people in wheelchairs or with other disabilities in MANY ways, I see ways it can be improved upon. I have disabled coworkers that struggle. Not very much but there's always room for improvement. Also, a lot of information gets missed because you are trained by random team members, not leaders. I was trained by someone who didn't know all the answers to everything herself. This can be dangerous since we work directly with patients. Also, within the staffing offices, there are people who try to be in charge of everyone else even though they have no seniority. They're mean, they tell lies about people they don't like to other team members, and they try to be completely in charge of everyone. Most people get a long well and work together well. I got a long with most people but there were a few people that were so unwelcoming and rude I dreaded working in certain areas within my department. And it doesn't seem like there's anyone to turn to.

Explore other reviews about UnityPoint Health

5.0
Jun 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work life balance, support from management

Cons

Pay, peers can be challenging at times

1.0
Jul 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

My team is the best!

Cons

They put directors in charge of functions they don’t actually understand, then surround themselves with people who tell them what they want to hear instead of what the organization needs to hear. The result is predictable: poor decisions, endless bureaucracy, and little accountability. They constantly talk about financial pressures while outsourcing work under the guise of “strategic partnerships” when it’s really about cutting costs. Cost reduction isn’t a strategy if you’re sacrificing capability, institutional knowledge, and long-term performance. My biggest concern is that they’ll continue making the same mistakes across other business functions before realizing the damage they’ve done. The organization has an extraordinary amount of tenure, but that’s not always a strength. Too often, poor performance is tolerated instead of addressed. Keeping low performers indefinitely while failing to invest in and reward high-performing talent creates unnecessary overhead and mediocrity. If they built teams around excellence instead of longevity, they’d likely achieve better results with fewer resources. Unless you’re looking for a corporate environment where there is zero accountability, conversations go in circles and leadership is more focused on protecting its own agenda than making difficult decisions, I wouldn’t recommend spending your time here.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All