Empower reviews

3.8

71% would recommend to a friend

(2,419 total reviews)
avatar

Edmund F. Murphy III

79% approve of CEO

70% positive business outlook

Empower has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 2,419 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Empower employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Financial Services industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
1.0
Apr 12, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits, training on the systems, and pay were the only pros I can think of.

Cons

Everything else was awful. This is a revolving door position that is focused solely on sales. For the most part you talk to people who have left their employer and try to convince them to open an IRA with Empower. While this can be a good fit for some people, it is not the right fit for everyone, and the only two offerings Empower has is a brokerage IRA that a client can get just about anywhere or a mutual fund only IRA with high expense ratios. Although these two options are very likely not the best fit for the customer your job is to find a way to convince them it is even though the companies values state they “do what’s right for the customer.”

1.0
Dec 3, 2016

Vicious cycle impacts technical staff

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The facilities are the only good thing going for GWF at this point in time; convenient locations to I-25, free parking, cafeteria, fitness center, store.

Cons

As a former IT employee of Great-West Financial (GWF) through 3 decades I have seen the cycles which are spiraling downward, especially since 2005. In the 90s GWF was a mid-sized company that was able to foster a great family (work/life balance) oriented environment. Originally conservative but balanced in their spending and technical advancement. Today GWF has become the typical large financial corporation where growth and profit are at all costs – especially to employees. In the 2000s new management (CIO) saw IT as a cost liability and reduced the IT budget year over year resulting in unreliable outdated systems and infrastructure. The results were frequent and significant outages. The dedicated, experienced and knowledgeable technical staff struggled to maintain service levels by committing their time and strong team ethics. Next cycle; triggered by a large acquisition/merger, was to replace the CIO (again) and spend millions of dollars to catch up technically. This was done with no additional staffing consideration. Time demands for the new systems, and technical nuances of significant upgrades caused another round of service levels issues, and management finger pointing impacted staff morale. Next cycle; replace AVPs with new management that determined the reason for system issues must be the “incompetency” of the technical staff. So, staff is driven out, or their positions “eliminated”. In one department, eight (of ten) staff gone, taking over 60 years of knowledge and experience. Newly hired directors hire former co-workers and friends for positions reporting to their direct reports (without interviews) who have no experience with a financial institution or the complexity of the technology employed. The amount of talent that has left GWF will clearly have a long term impact. Spending money to address all these issues, IT is once again facing budget concerns even as the company continues to push growth. When and what will the next inevitable cycle bring?

1.0
Nov 7, 2023

Turnover machine

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Remote work available, equipment, fast hiring

Cons

High expectations, 4 hours of talk time and min 40 calls per day . Call center at its worst. No ongoing training or any career advancement discussion . I worked there a year with 2 weeks training. Expected to do more with no extra pay or incentive. CEO Is political with disregard of diverse work force. High turnover and burnout rate of any company I worked for . Goals are unrealistic and products you are required to push are outdated and expensive . You are not helping your customers at all , main goal is to make money for the company disregarding fiduciary responsibility. Light years behind companies like Fidelity or Merrill. Outdated systems with horrible user experience. Benefits on par with Walmart.

avatar
Empower Response
2y
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We appreciate your insights and concerns and always recommend that associates provide feedback to leaders so we can constantly improve for our collective success.
Viewing 7 - 9 of 2,419 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,524 Empower reviews submitted anonymously by Empower employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Empower is right for you.