employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

FlightSafety International

Engaged Employer

FlightSafety International reviews

3.5

66% would recommend to a friend

(713 total reviews)

Eric Hinson

57% approve of CEO

48% positive business outlook

FlightSafety International has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 713 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The FlightSafety International employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Aerospace & Defense industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

713 reviews
1.0
Oct 24, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Almost all instructors (and other Center employees) are a great mix of highly competent and personable people. The same goes for almost all clients. Working facilities (including simulators and classroom equipment) are top-notch.

Cons

A continual undercurrent of tension pervades the New Castle, Delaware FlightSafety International Learning Center. Management activities (such as monitoring employee activities with a security camera system, unfairly and unequally treating employees to give advantage to management politically-favored employees, and arranging for underqualified management members to attain a quickie aircraft type-rating (such as a GV) to bolster their "value" for promotion within FSI) have resulted in employees regarding management with suspicion and a complete lack of trust. When a "town hall" meeting for employees was arranged at the Center, only 3 of the over 400 employees showed up. Management personnel accomplish their functions through email, not by personal interface. They maintain a, "don't worry, be happy" attitude, as demonstrated by the daily "Care" briefings. These "feel good" sessions, conducted in the client lounge, are regarded by employees and clients alike as a bad joke. Career progression for instructors? There is none. At one time, FlightSafety had a clear career path for instructors, and promotions for center management positions were from the ranks of (usually) long-time instructor personnel. That has changed - key management personnel have little or no real instructional or aircraft experience, and appear to be selected by company headquarters personnel to mirror their own background. Since they lack any background in what makes the company function, they regard instructors as an irritant, unhappily necessary for the company to function as a money-making machine. Pay and benefits are marginal at best. FSI formerly had a defined-benefit pension plan. Woops! Gone - and, place taken by a 401k (have you looked at yours lately?). Pay is static. Going "above and beyond" (in terms of accepting additional responsibilities) doesn't even merit a simple "thank you" from management. In a way, this is understandable since they have no idea (again, no background) of what an instructor (or customer service rep) does. For those looking at FlightSafety International as a potential employer, regard working at FSI as a "bridge" position to better and much more rewarding work elsewhere in aviation.

1.0
Oct 10, 2011

dont care about people

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

instructing was satisfying because of the students not the employer

Cons

never got a raise in 10 years. they would lie about wages and would not help employees work with government agentcies to correct wage issues. that is why they whent Union

2.0
Aug 26, 2011

Worsening with new management.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I'm having trouble filling out this section. Most of the "great" reasons to work here are either on the way out the door (good managers are retiring, morale is sinking) , or unavailable to new employees (pension plan has been unavailable for new hires since 2006). Historically we have been a low-risk company, doing everything possible to keep things simple and keep people happy, and happily employed. Past performance does not guarantee future results... I think our production at FlightSafety Simulation (based in Broken Arrow, OK) strikes a great balance between engineering (which constantly sees the need to make it better) and accounting (which constantly requests that we get another one shipped, sooner, cheaper). We build usable, reliable training devices and in general, we respond quickly to customer's requests. Of course your perspective greatly influences your perception of our performance.... if you're a military customer, you'll think we give you the world because we answer your phone calls without a charge number. Corporate management is doing a great job of expanding our services to survive and compete in a global market.

Cons

We didn't used to have to say "teammates are our most valuable resource." When a company feels the need to make this statement, that means it's not obvious enough for employees to figure that part out on their own. The new upper management personnel (I'm speaking locally, not corporately) are egocentric, career-focused, and some of them have anger management issues. Their goals are to make things look good on paper, in the news, etc. but the concern for making things work well within the company is not as high as it should be.

Viewing 694 - 696 of 713 Reviews

Glassdoor has 752 FlightSafety International reviews submitted anonymously by FlightSafety International employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if FlightSafety International is right for you.