employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Ford Audio-Video Systems

Is this your company?

Ford Audio-Video Systems reviews

2.8

38% would recommend to a friend

(303 total reviews)
avatar

Jim Ford

47% approve of CEO

43% positive business outlook

Ford Audio-Video Systems has an employee rating of 2.8 out of 5 stars, based on 303 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Ford Audio-Video Systems employee rating is 27% below average for employers within the Arts, Entertainment & Recreation industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

303 reviews
2.0
Aug 13, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent pay, good people in office. Great work life balance.

Cons

Horrible, archaic benefits, “earned” PTO, no sick pay, forced to use PTO for weather events such as freezing roads, tornados, hurricanes, flooding or office closure for any reason such as no power. Bereavement only for “immediate family” which only includes parents, siblings, children, or spouse, so if your grandparents or cousins or aunt/uncle or best friend passes away, you have to use PTO or not get paid

3.0
Aug 8, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good opportunity to experience AV installs in a variety of venues

Cons

Micro management, lack of transparency, and many non-answer responses to concerns often invalidates the employment experience

1.0
Aug 7, 2025

The Truth About Ford AV

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pay is on time (can that really be counted as a pro for a company this size?). Most people are great to work with. You can gain experience for your next job. If you can handle the micro-management, you can handle working anywhere. The negative reviews are true. You'll see patterns for a reason.

Cons

To qualify myself to the unknown reader, I was with this company for many years and advanced multiple times during my tenure. Yes, this is a negative. Do not stay with Ford. Get whatever experience or money that you need and leave ASAP. There seems to be many positive reviews that were "encouraged" after an employee received a positive performance review. Some were simply written by upper management after being directed to do so. This is an attempt to counter the negative reviews. Ignore these. They are not genuine. On the other hand, it's a hilarious accusation that they claim all these negative reviews are being done by their competitors. Why aren't these competitors receiving similarly specific negative reviews? Why are there so many consistent negative reviews and accounts confirming they are true? I want to preface these next sections, that this is mostly focused on my experience with the Fords. 99% of people here were great. The previous CEO should be avoided at all costs. Her wild mood swings are something of legend. You never know which version you will get. When the head of HR quits after having nasty things said about her family, you know she's toxic. The Dallas Division Manager is not to be trusted and is unprofessional. Micro-management would be an improvement. Nano-management would be more apt. Why? It's baked into the cake! Everything your manager is required to report on to their bosses all circles back to that general distrust of everyone. The more experienced people can work around these and build a rapport of trust within their department. Pay is below industry competition for many roles. Do not buy into the false promises of profit sharing covering any shortages from your salary. Those are vastly lower than what you will be told. Performance reviews are not scheduled. If you're working a role in a cost center (not profit) then you'll get repeatedly bumped for other people's reviews. Get used to waiting 6-12 months for your review after you request it. Hey! Just in time to request it again! But wait, now you have objectives you must complete in X amount of days to earn that juicy pay bump (if you even get one). Do not buy into any vague "carrot-on-a-stick" goals. They will find any arbitrary reason to not pay on those. There's zero consideration for cost of living raises so there's no minimum to expect. The uppermost management (The 2 Fords) have little regard for their people and lead by an example of distrust and hammer. Distrust and question everything your employees do. Hammer them into a pulp at every opportunity. The good leaders know to ignore this example and approach with a more even-keeled and understanding approach. The newer or more spineless leaders will follow their tactics without question. One of these retains good employees and shoulders the abuse from up top. The other does not retain their employees and takes a different kind of abuse. Cause believe me, at some point you will get in their sights if you stick around long enough and you will be in the wrong for something. Best thing to do when this happens is just admit you were wrong (even when you know you weren't) cause you cannot convince them otherwise. Be prepared for multi-hour phone calls or meetings when this happens and good luck keeping up with your work as a result. Just another negative for them to hammer you on. It's a common practice to miss the forest for the trees here. You'll be asked (more like forced) to investigate issues that are inconsequential to company time, practices, or cost, but the investigation and ultimate resolution cost will exceed whatever the initial goal was. Stepping over dollars to pick up pennies. Lack of consideration for personnel hours in modifying a procedure to account for a 0.1% error. Someone miss something once in 10 years? Better update the procedure and have everyone in that role check for it forever. Do that ad nauseum and soon you have over-inflated processes with minimal return to the company and far more stress to the employee. There are some processes that require they are touched by a minimum of 6 people (many in corporate roles). You'd think there would be some high dollar threshold for this. Nope! $50 minimum. Constantly flabbergasted at the ritualistic loss of money in operations. Training is great for entry-level positions, but that falls off precipitously as you advance. Don't expect them to increase your salary in correlation to your new responsibilities. It will be based on whatever you hired in at, not what the position is typically paid based on experience or the job market. Specific job or position expectations get very vague or are completely missing as you advance. Your tasks and expectations are decided on a whim and constantly change. Let's not forget to mention workloads. You will find many people get new tasks heaped upon them and are told this is temporary, but its usually permanent. Have expectations been managed for this with your current responsibilities? Was your pay adjusted? The answer to both will be a resounding NO. Just be a team player. They love to fire people and then not replace them. Just put the workload on the next "best" person and watch them slowly drown. Rinse and repeat. These practices really show the lack of appreciation and forethought they have for their workers. PTO is a joke. You accrue at a set rate daily 365 days a year which sounds pretty good, until you see its PTO for everything. This includes sick days. Also, inclement weather and bereavement policies are a joke. Make sure you bank that precious PTO or you won't get to see gran-gran at her funeral without taking a pay cut! Whatever PTO you do use, don't be surprised if you are contacted. There's little to no consideration of your attempts at having a work/life balance. Having surgery? Sick? You'll still get calls. Are you hourly? Salary? Guess what? You get treated the same regardless. You still have to fill out timesheets to account for every minute of your time, and depending on how much you do in a given day, this may require you to allot time just to fill out a timesheet otherwise you'll be grilled on where your time went the next day. Remember that distrust I mentioned? Covid-19 was an eye opener showing how many people didn't need to report to offices to work. Ford had to adjust to this to retain and gain employees in roles that did not require people in the field or at a cubicle. Understand they did this very begrudgingly. Again, distrust. You're probably not at your computer working. For a technology-based company its quite ironic how dated the systems are. They look like they're from 1973 and very well might be. They work in the limited capacity they are in, but there are tons of automation features being missed by refusing to move to current standards. Travel is very high for most positions. If you're in a position that does not require travel, don't be surprised if someday they find a reason for you to travel. Be ready to share a hotel room when you do travel. Privacy? What's that? Regardless of the positive contributions you make to the company, they won't truly be appreciated. They will always want more and if you can't deliver on that, your past achievements are null and void. You are replaceable. Everything is tracked down to whatever tools you use or items at your desk. That stapler? It's assigned to you cause you sit at that desk. That chair? You sit in it so it's assigned to you. Every little thing you touch is assigned and tracked cause you cannot be trusted. Stay on top of these fixed assets from day one so you don't get stuck paying for any mis-assigned assets when you leave.

Viewing 10 - 12 of 303 Reviews

Glassdoor has 313 Ford Audio-Video Systems reviews submitted anonymously by Ford Audio-Video Systems employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Ford Audio-Video Systems is right for you.