employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Four Winds Interactive

Engaged Employer

Four Winds Interactive reviews

2.9

45% would recommend to a friend

(47 total reviews)

David Levin

63% approve of CEO

42% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

47 reviews

Reviews about "Compensation"

Return to all reviews
1.0
Nov 20, 2020

Used to be awesome

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great people, cool office space, challenging work

Cons

Things seemed to have gone downhill after Vista took over the company. It’s now all about the bottom line, which I understand, but they’ve definitely lost that small start up family vibe. There were layoffs right before the holidays in 2019, then furloughs in April(COVID). FWI heavily relies on the hospitality industry, so I understand the reduction of force during the pandemic......but they acquired a company after cutting all those people. Teams were not consulted on who would be let go. It seems like the people who remained were the newest(lower salary) with the least amount of experience. The loss of knowledge made work extremely difficult. The furloughed group was finally told after 7 months that they were not going to be brought back even though a “90 day” group was being told they were for sure coming back. I am good friends with several of the furloughed employees and they all say communication during this time was horrible. When they did receive emails, the content was riddled with spelling errors(like someone was drunk)and had nothing to do with the state of the company but plenty of info about FWI’s “great”diversity program. The product is cool in theory, but it is not easy to use. They’re trying to make FWI Cloud a thing, but there are lots of bugs and I think the on-prem solution is better. A ton of people are leaving right now, and I don’t blame them.

2.0
Sep 4, 2020

Look elsewhere until Vista is no long associated with the company.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- The people I worked with are amazing. - My manager was the best boss I've ever had. - The benefits were pretty good - Although unlimited PTO was changed to flexible PTO - aka 3 weeks max. - There is an emphasis on professional development within the company - The product is very cool.

Cons

FWI used to be great! It had an amazing people first culture, great people, a snazzy product, and plenty of perks to make it a desirable workplace to anyone. But then Vista came along, buying a majority of the company, and basically pulled all kinds of tricks to ensure they get their ROI in what I would assume is a short term goal. There have been a multitude of reg flags in the past year, and hopefully this will help potential employees make a sound decision. November 2019: Imagine this. You've just started your day and you're sitting in a meeting, talking to a client, or even on PTO. If you're one of the many who were in the office, you get an email from leadership to come to a conference room for a mandatory meeting. While you're in there, IT is disabling your entire access to everything - Laptop, emails, slack, the whole shebang. You're told you're no longer needed, on the spot - A whole room of people, fired, effective immediately. No information hand off, and you only have a very short time to collect your belongings. You are escorted from the building. If you weren't in the office, you receive an email saying you are no longer employed and that you'll be sent a box with your possessions, and told to mail your laptop back to them. (To FWI's credit, they did give everyone a severance package, offered resume services, and helped people find new work.) Nearly 40 people were laid off. April 2020: FWI decides it cannot weather the storm that is COVID with all of its employees... The CARES Act comes into play, and FWI decides that the government should cover the costs. A round of furloughs are inevitable. 70 odd people this time. Half of these are told a 90 day furlough, the others, until Jan 1st, 2021. If you were in the latter, this was essentially a termination of your employment - A seemingly easy way for FWI to let you go without having to say the words. The 90 day furloughs - It felt like a lucky dip to be invited back. I know people who were pushed out to more than 150 days before even being considered to be invited back to work. Some of the furloughed employees were even the ones who were the best voted by other colleagues over the course of a year. Fancy furloughing the people who received the most amount of commendation by their peers. In a town hall immediately before the furloughs were announced, the CEO told everyone that Vista was not a bank account who could just bail out employees. Perhaps if Vista were to sacrifice a fraction of their billions, employee loyalty, and the people first culture might still hold true. Questionable & concerning instances over 2019-2020: - An entire HR team has left and a new team is in place. - People are promoted to new roles, and then fired a month or so later. - People who have been at the company for several years are randomly made redundant. Likely due to the following below. - Overhearing leadership talk about their objective to primarily hire college grads so they can transition to a cheaper workforce. - Making everyone take a pay cut at the start of COVID and cancelling all matching 401k payments. - Returning furloughed employees were also forced to take a pay cut. - Furloughed employees were completely cut off from any useful company information and updates - No town halls, check-ups on your wellbeing, nothing to make you feel like you were a part of the company. FWI made no real efforts to accommodate, communicate or empathize with furloughed employees. - Exit interviews for furloughed employees consist of a 3 question survey. No call from your leadership team, no gratification for the work you've done for the company. You're sent a box to send your laptop back to them. - FWI acquired a software company (with "alternative money") headquartered in the UK, bringing on 40 more international employees while more than 50% of furloughed employees are left hanging in limbo. - FWI fires a CFO in April 2020 in order to save money, and hires a new CFO 3 months later. - A CSO is hired while there are still people on furlough. - Departments have been told to create detailed videos/documentation on how to do their job. I'll let you use your imagination on why this is a thing. Some more cons: - Some departments are on track for burn-out due to leadership choosing not to bring back furloughed employees to balance the work-life load. - Some positions weren't backfilled after a furloughed employee voluntarily left. - There doesn't seem to be much opportunity to upskill and obtain third party certifications or training. - Vista seems to be playing the finite game - Responding reactively to the ups and downs rather than finding a way to overcome all challenges and prolong the longevity of the company. - Leadership will spin bad news or questionable company decisions in a way which leave you wondering if what they're saying is actually true. FWI used to be a transparent, people first, empathetic culture. Sadly, FWI does not radiate a great culture these days, but likes to pretend they still have it in order to attract younger, cheaper talent. The one thing that Vista is good at - Killing culture and morale.

2.0
Apr 6, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-You learn a lot at the beginning -Majority of co-workers are great to work with -Pays well with a little experience -Benefits are pretty good (as of writing this) -Work from home/remote -My initial first few years were great, but it started going downhill (and rapidly) in the last year or so. My situation was a bit unique though so I do not recommend basing any decisions of my review alone. -Promotion money is very good, raises between roles are not (see cons) -A con would be that we are tracked (metric wise) for code pushes, but the reason this is a pro is because to the end of my time there they did not seem to hold it over any ones head and kept their word that it was just for 'overall group' performance, and not to scrutinize someone. I do have to applaud them for it. -Not too many people are all about the jargon (for developers) and using the latest and greatest. There are some, but I imagine that's the case anywhere. So it's not too bad.

Cons

-Generally feels like people WANT to do good (developers), but sometimes can't. Either because of the sprints or because of too tight of a schedule. Doesn't really feel like a lot of creative freedom in that sense in development. -Changes are sometimes introduced that are not easily ported from one platform to another. And there is little consulting with the other platforms prior to introduction. (My situation was a bit unique, so I would not let this one be too discouraging from my review alone) -Does feel more corporate now (acquired by Vista). So there are raise caps and such now. Which is fine, a company needs to be profitable after all. So not a major complaint. -People outside of your department tend to 'appear to listen', but don't really actually appear to listen? Or maybe they're just powerless to address actual concerns (even at the very top?). So take everything with a grain of salt. You start to catch on pretty quick that acknowledgements of your concerns don't really translate to actual changes or action items on anyone's parts. -Health benefits leave a little to be desired. But HSA is nice -A lot of management managing management (which I know is essential for larger corporations), but it just feels like a lot gets lost in communication. It may be that some people have too much sway or too little sway. Maybe someone above is getting micromanaged and denied creative control over products. It's hit or miss with your managers on dev side. You really gotta push for what you think is essential). -Some dev environments are incredibly unstable (like the ones other dev-teams rely on). I am not necessarily blaming the developers as it might be a result of tight deadlines and too much packed into those deadlines. Most people I speak to are hard working and have good intentions on the developer side, but maybe don't have the resources (time) they need. It did seem like this was getting better when I left, but it's hard to tell if it'll stay that way. Comes back around to possible poor management somewhere in the hierarchy. I could not speak for their teams, only an impression. -Promotions are pretty much on a time track. If you start Junior, you'll be a Standard D in 2 years. Then you'll be level 2 in 2 years. And then in 2-3 you'll be a Senior developer. The money is great for those promotions, however. Between those promotions it is now capped at a low % (likely because of Vista). -C-suite seems somewhat unstable. -Hiring internally seems oddly lacking. Sometimes not, sometimes it does. -We have a software architect, but I'm not sure what they actually do (my position is unique I want to remind you, so maybe the product I worked on was not a consideration). -Sometimes there appear to be jobs that you wonder what their actual role is, but that's not entirely fair since I don't actually watch them. They may actually be useful positions. -There are some strange 'success' metrics used (which I believe are primarily for sales) that we were originally considered for as well. But they were complete garbage in my opinion. -Could probably use some more code reviews to ensure stability. And I mean actual code reviews, not '1 line gets 1 hour', but a '300 line change gets one minute because I can't be bothered'. Might relieve some of the instability in some code bases. -Some people like to pull tech words so far out of the void that it baffles me. You don't have a lot of these people which is nice, but there are some who are all about the latest (and greatest in their opinion). So Jargon, etc. -They did have a big round of layoffs (I was not a part of them). Things were going downhill before that. I would take some of the heated reviews mentioning it with a grain of salt. Not that I think the points are all invalid, but some exaggerate a lot. One mentioned 'firing and then rehiring', but there are very little rehires/hires going on at the time. There were definitely some and it felt like a 'fire the expensive people, hire cheaper', but it was not as widespread. Development teams have not seen many (if any) significant new hires as far as I'm aware. Maybe some. But I could be wrong as well.

Viewing 10 - 12 of 47 Reviews

Glassdoor has 227 Four Winds Interactive reviews submitted anonymously by Four Winds Interactive employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Four Winds Interactive is right for you.