GALLO reviews

4.1

73% would recommend to a friend

(1,231 total reviews)

Ernest Gallo

88% approve of CEO

59% positive business outlook

GALLO has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 1,231 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The GALLO employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufacturing industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
1.0
Apr 17, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

wine benefits The pros do not outweigh the cons at all, though.

Cons

Gallo’s Finance department exemplifies a toxic work environment defined by favoritism, inequities in opportunities, and a lack of respect for employees. To begin, favoritism among upper management is pervasive. Promotions and opportunities are often dictated by whether an employee is "well-liked" rather than based on merit or performance. For instance, management has been known to strategically position employees, encouraging them to apply for roles like pawns, rather than fostering a collaborative process that considers the employee's career goals and aspirations. While certain employees are fast-tracked for promotions, bypassing standard timelines for rotations, others are held back under the guise of adhering to those same timelines. This inconsistent application of rules creates an unequal and demoralizing environment. The Financial Development Program adds another layer of toxicity. Employees are implicitly discouraged from living outside of Modesto and are expected to commute to the office 4–5 days a week. Those who choose to live elsewhere or value a more balanced lifestyle are often labeled as “not committed.” This mindset alienates recent graduates, many of whom prefer to live in or near cities rather than in Modesto. Meanwhile, those who choose to live locally are lauded for their dedication, creating a divisive culture. Management culture in the Finance department is another serious concern. Certain managers exhibit sexist behavior or fail to value employees below the manager level, often neglecting to provide them with meaningful time or guidance. Additionally, some managers and senior managers seem more focused on advancing their own careers than on mentoring or supporting their teams. On a personal note, when I requested more opportunities in my role to match the responsibilities given to my peers, my concerns were largely dismissed, leaving me feeling unheard and undervalued. Work-life balance is virtually nonexistent, and employee appreciation feels like an afterthought. A particularly telling example is the recent decision to eliminate summer hours, a long-standing benefit that added much-needed flexibility during the summer months. This decision further underscores the lack of consideration for employees' well-being and morale. In summary, Gallo’s Finance department fosters a culture of favoritism, inequity, and disregard for employee satisfaction and growth. While there may be opportunities for professional development for a select few, the broader environment is one of exclusion and disillusionment.

avatar
GALLO Response
1y
The conduct you have described does not align with our company values and is concerning. We will be sharing your review with our HR and Finance leadership teams and wish you the best in your future endeavors.
3.0
Mar 23, 2023

Icebergs Ahead

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Up until today Gallo has been a people-first company where the culture is to support employees and their families over the drive for profitability above all. Gallo has a lot of opportunities, a collaborative environment, many initiatives to support Diversity and Inclusion, and a fun working environment. The work-life balance has been excellent.

Cons

There are early signs that the culture is heading towards profit-first at the expense of its people, which is being felt in a several ways: Pay increases have significantly lagged behind inflation for years (despite two raises, I'm paid $7000 less today than I was 2 years ago when you account for inflation - BOY am I feeling it, and I'm not alone) New people are being hired in at higher salaries than the experienced team members they are joining Any attempt to negotiate salary is shut down immediately. Managers are powerless to support their people when it comes to fair pay; HR has total control over new hiring and salaries The process of industry benchmarking to determine fair wages does not appear to be conducted in the light of required responsibilities and skills. The focus seems to be on basic job title. This leads many employees to be benchmarked against lower skill positions compared to their actual duties, and paid less than they're worth. Employee performance assessments by department are required to conform to a bell curve, where most employees must be rated as average, but a percentage *must* be rated below or far below average, and a few must be rated as above or far above. Managers are routinely forced to downgrade the high ratings they gave to deserving employees in order to conform their department to the bell curve. It's insulting both to employees and the science of statistics, and it keeps merit-based raises low. It honestly makes me consider intentionally hiring some low-performers that will be rated low, so I can preserve the ability to rate my rock stars accordingly and try to get them what they deserve. Performance-based bonuses are limited to certain classes of employee As a result of all this, amongst most people I talk to within and without my department, morale is presently at an all-time low - and I've been here more than a decade. The general feeling is - why work hard, why be "intrapreneurial," when no matter how hard we work, we're rated middle of the road and can only watch as inflation eats up our stagnant wages.

avatar
GALLO Response
3y
Thank you for your candid thoughts. I would be glad to meet with you to discuss our pay-for-performance and salary benchmarking processes. Investing in our employees' learning and development is a top priority. Please contact me directly to schedule a time to further discuss your feedback. Thank you for all you do. Michelle Lewis VP, Global Human Resources
3.0
May 10, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

One of the best companies to work for in the Central Valley in terms of perks and opportunities. Rotational programs for undergraduate and MBA hires are great to get business exposure and learn different segments of the business. The family that is in top management are humble and have earned their roles through hard worth starting at the bottom.

Cons

Growth opportunities are mostly provided to those whom are considered favorites, and are very limited. The company continuously adds layers between senior analysts/accountants and management roles making it merely impossible for employees to ever become managers. Work life balance is difficult in a lot of roles there’s high expectations to deliver. The company breeds a very competitive environment where employees find themselves consistently over-performing and rotating out of a role too quickly. Rotations happen too often and people don’t stay in a role long enough to actually drive sustainability or anything that’s long-term value added to the role. Company only focuses on high performers and not much is done to understand why some employees are low performers nor how they can leverage on their skill sets to help them grow. Not much diversity or inclusion. Most mid to top management predominately white males.

avatar
GALLO Response
5y
Thanks for your thorough feedback. We will be sharing your review with our Executive Leadership team. Best of luck to you.
Viewing 16 - 18 of 1,231 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,235 GALLO reviews submitted anonymously by GALLO employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if GALLO is right for you.