GitLab reviews

3.4

53% would recommend to a friend

(742 total reviews)

Bill Staples

38% approve of CEO

37% positive business outlook

GitLab has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 742 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The GitLab employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

742 reviews
2.0
Apr 4, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people itself in the team (not Management) are amazing. I made good friends there. Other departments besides Sales are great with inspiring leaders and hardworking, smart and top-notch people.

Cons

I joined GitLab with high hopes, drawn in by its reputation as a pioneering company in the tech industry. Unfortunately, my experience as an Account Executive was deeply disappointing, characterized by toxic management, unattainable targets, and an atmosphere of intransparency and favoritism. The management at GitLab is exceptionally toxic, leading with an ego and fostering an environment of distrust and anxiety among employees. Layoffs are happening, and the fear of being next looms constantly. Middle management is notorious for micromanaging, leaving little room for autonomy or creativity in executing tasks. Administrative tasks are more important than actually selling. Communication from management to the team is poor, with crucial information often withheld or selectively shared, breeding further mistrust. One of the most demoralizing aspects of working at GitLab is the unreasonably high sales targets that are set, which are for 90% of the team impossible to achieve. Teams are on average on 50% attainment. Despite putting in considerable effort, it quickly becomes apparent that success is not rewarded, and failure is met with harsh criticism rather than support or constructive feedback. Furthermore, there is blatant favoritism within the team, with certain individuals receiving preferential treatment while others are unfairly sidelined. This culture of favoritism only serves to deepen the sense of disillusionment and takes away any remaining trust in the organization. Moreover, there is a lack of transparency in the Sales Department, particularly concerning decision-making processes and future plans. Middle management keeps employees in the dark, leaving them feeling disconnected and undervalued. It's disheartening to witness the decline of a company that once held such promise. While some may cling to nostalgic memories of GitLab's past, the reality is that it has devolved into a toxic work environment where loyalty is nonexistent and management prioritizes appearances over the well-being of its employees. In conclusion, my time at GitLab was led by disappointment and frustration. I would caution anyone considering joining the organization to carefully evaluate the work culture and management practices before making a commitment. GitLab may have a strong reputation in the industry, but beneath the surface lies a company that has lost its way.

1.0
Sep 20, 2023

Sad to see what it turned into.

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Product! The product is fantastic and is loved by those that use it. Along as the promises of functionality are actually followed up on and not binned this will continue to grow and add value. Holiday/Vacation! Unlimited PTO (although this is a somewhat pointless offering because of the workload) the ability to work from anywhere is great for those wishing to travel (role dependant). Colleagues! Some fantastic colleagues however these are leaving on mass or extremely unhappy.

Cons

It's sad because the problems are the exact same ones that happens at a lot of companies. A fantastic product is created which shows value to those that use it but the growth strategy around this is poorly executed and the potential dies. Management! Managers follow the old strategy of hiring on mass in the hope that this will work and zero thought is put into execution. Instead of making sure their team has the right accounts to do the job, an excel spreadsheet is compiled to put random company names together (some no longer in business) without any thought on propensity to buy, current competition, economic impact for customers industry or buying cycles. In addition, management stated it can take 9-24 months to break into an account. Building and investing in relationships was key however we saw accounts changed frequently for new members at the same time targets increased by 50% each year. The field team highlighted the simple fact that making someone work on breaking into an account for 12 months, only then to remove you is a waste of time for that individual. Culture! The culture has eroded to the point where Gitlab doesn't follow some of the core values anymore (some people have asked why they are still on there). The collaborative nature of teams has diminished and bullying and politics has come into play in many roles. Concern grows when talented employees from all parts of the business hand in their notice and nothing is said about it. Business has turned into a hire and fire company with no consideration around employees wellness. Customer Success Plans and other Tools! Whilst GitLab talks about consolidation of tools (eliminating the toolchain taxation) we strive to have as many useless tools as possible. We use customer account planning tools that don't fully work or integrate with SFDC and were purchased based on a managers view rather than the people who use it. It's also not available to the whole team so CSM, SE's, Sales members all use something different. This is because whilst we preach standardisation, each team wants to use something different. Strangely we didn't use our own product to build something but this is because of the love of dashboards and pandering to the few to the detriment of the many. You'll also be pleased to hear that SFDC at GitLab, like most companies is administered by someone who left years ago and never told the company. Simple issues don't change for years and never will, you must learn what caused things to crash and avoid them forever more. PPT!!!!! Be prepared to create an entirely new PPT each quarter for account plans. Even thought this info is in the Account Planning Tool, SFDC and millions of other places this needs to be created again in PPT. The Org chart tool is useful so management can periodically state that we need to speak to people that you'd already said you need to.

1.0
Nov 19, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Remote working Friends and Family days Unlimited leave policy (this is slowly getting obselete due to micromanagement and lack of trust and transparency)

Cons

There is nothing personal in this review but wanted to know my fellow sales peers know about the exact situation so just in case they have the right details to take the right decisions. 1. Their have been recent changes in the APAC sales leadership. The basic expectation from the leadership is to build and have a culture of trust with the fellow team members(IC’s and other teams) but sales leadership is only worried about looking good at the HQ level and doesn’t really cares about sorting the challenges at the team is facing at the ground level. The leadership is not willing to take inputs from the IC team and is making decisions without any factual data. 2. There is suddenly a culture of high bureaucracy and blame games which exactly is opposite of the fantastic foundational C.R.E.D.I.T values of GitLab. The CEO is away for a while and will be really disappointed(once back) to see on what’s happening to the employees at the IC level. The new leadership is a super secretive, and follows a culture of zero trust and zero transparency and collaboration. I have been in industry for a long time and I have seen and heard of many experiences where the teams are doomed because of some not so good mediocre people who are just control freak. 3. Microsoft is moving really fast in the region and the lack of planning and execution of GTM is another reason GitLab in APAC can be left behind. 4. Everyone in APAC team works really hard to build the business from ground up but their is zero acknowledgment of that shown by the leadership. As mentioned earlier the new leadership only tries to play blame games and find faults 5. I joined the GitLab team due to its fantastic culture but now because of this new bureaucratic, zero trust culture their is high stress level between the team members and I am also seeking medical help for stress related problems. If this leadership continues in APAC there will be soon a time that a culture of hiring and firing(without any logic or facts and just based on liking of some individual) and finding good talent will be challenge for GitLab. 6. GitLab APAC has zero career development plan and the new leadership is trying to get rid of existing people and trying to bring in new people of their known background so that they can have a solid control and build a culture as they would like.

Viewing 415 - 417 of 742 Reviews

Glassdoor has 810 GitLab reviews submitted anonymously by GitLab employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if GitLab is right for you.