GlobalFoundries reviews

3.6

66% would recommend to a friend

(2,427 total reviews)
avatar

Tim Breen

72% approve of CEO

42% positive business outlook

GlobalFoundries has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 2,427 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The GlobalFoundries employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufacturing industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
2.0
Oct 23, 2014

not impressive

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I didn't see any pros in this company. They give good health benefits. In this place, people are coming from different culture and we can know about more cultures.

Cons

Managers asks lower level people advice and didn't consider advices. This place is not US work culture. The people brought Singapore work culture. Simple example, I need to work at any time if any problem in our applications. But they don't allow work from home if needed. I am working more than 2 yrs, I didn't get appreciation for my work and didn't get any bonus. They don't allow to fix the problems permanently because management thought it may lead to new problems and they don't allow test new logic. Here there is no professional growth.

1.0
Feb 10, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Investor hasn't seemed to give up - just hired a new CEO

Cons

1. Hired way to many VP, directors, and managers before they even began to hire any engineers: A roomful of managers with no one to delegate tasks to quickly turns the environment into top-heavy, micromanaging, and full of toxic politics. 2. Over-stretching corporate objectives too far: The company started with a very ambitious goal - to merge two companies (AMD's fab and Charter) and at the same time overtake TSMC in technology lead. While that's challenging enough, the company executive decided to develop multiple technology lines in parallel. 5 years since the company's inception and billions of dollars spent, none of these dreams are anywhere close to realize. 3. Chose to built the fab in the remote corner of upper state New York: The geography lacked a sustainable pool of local talent and vendor support, and the remoteness discourages many good candidate to come. After the attrition rate started to rise, it is very difficult for the company to find experienced replacement. 4. Weak executive leadership team: Not sure whose idea it is to put together a leadership team with members all from failed, bankrupted, or acquired companies. None of them have the experience running a SUCCESSFUL company. 5. Relocation a large number of formerly Charter managers from Singapore to Malta: Should have relocated engineers rather than managers. On top adding to an already over-staffed management layer, the Singapore managers frequently use public humiliations and midnight calls to intimidate their subordinates - a common culture in Asia but not welcome in America.

1.0
Jan 14, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The split from AMD was a good idea, and has potential. Their current funding from ATIC provides stability and the offices are nice. Being on the cutting edge provides some excitement and meaning to the work you are doing. The area is quite nice, with lots of amenities if you are into outdoor stuff. If you get the right manager, you might thrive - it is a growing company with lots of room for advancement. Senior management seems pretty good and has a good plan, it would be great if that filtered down.

Cons

So much micromanagement and so many silos prevent people from getting their jobs done. There is a lot of emphasis on following convoluted processes rather than getting things done. There is a lot of focus on generating documentation that everyone knows that nobody reads and couldn't find if they tried. Knowledge sharing is minimal between silos and the documentation produced doesn't get distributed to those needing it. HR practices are horrible. It takes forever to hire new resources, and the old boys network makes it hard to get good people in. The budget is tight, and so HR rigs the annual reviews to prevent bonuses and promotion. HR policies make it hard to transfer internally, and make you a target when attempting to. Work-life issues are particularly bad. Lots of desk checks. You are expected to be on call 24 hours a day, but answering calls at 3 am isn't considered for why you aren't at your desk for a phone in call at 7 am (even when half the people in the meeting are also calling in). It is an international company with most meetings involving people across the world, but they still haven't figured out how to manage that, treating local people specially which leads to tensions among the remotely distributed teams. It is very management heavy, and everyone knows that can't last. Every manager is staking out their territory and making their job seem important. This leads to a lot of finger pointing and chest beating, and not a lot of problem solving. Which leads to micromanagement, asking for project updates many times a day and shifting priorities every time you talk to any manager. You often report to more than one manager, and when they tell you different things . . . nothing good can come of that. The upper management seems to have a decent plan, but it doesn't filter down the chain, and nobody seems to notice. They still haven't seemed to figured out how to be a distributed, international company. With major operations in Germany, Singapore and the US, there is constant infighting about who has control, and seemingly nobody that can actually make a decision. This leads to constant infighting and parallel projects where nobody can gain the upper hand to implement their vision. Many projects trudge along for years with local approval but global discord, nobody willing to pull the plug and nobody having the authority to go forward. There is a lot of good work that has been done but unimplemented. The political garbage seems to have more power than any engineering management, but is less effective due to some disconnect between upper and lower management.

Viewing 157 - 159 of 2,427 Reviews

Glassdoor has 3,899 GlobalFoundries reviews submitted anonymously by GlobalFoundries employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if GlobalFoundries is right for you.