Guidehouse reviews

3.1

40% would recommend to a friend

(2,790 total reviews)
avatar

Scott McIntyre

38% approve of CEO

33% positive business outlook

Guidehouse has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 2,790 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Guidehouse employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management & Consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
1.0
Jun 9, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I can' think of any pros.

Cons

Since Guidehouse acquired Grant Thornton’s public sector, the company has laid off thousands of highly capable employees — often without any clear explanation. Many of these individuals were top performers, only to see their roles reposted shortly after, which feels both dishonest and exploitative. What makes matters worse is the lack of clear guidance or direction from senior management. Communication is vague, leadership is largely absent, and decisions appear to be driven by short-term profit rather than long-term vision or employee well-being. It’s disheartening to see such disregard for people who have contributed meaningfully to the organization. Guidehouse seriously needs to reflect on how it treats its workforce and the culture it's creating.

1.0
May 23, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nothing of value to offer

Cons

My time working in this government office was deeply disappointing. What should have been a role focused on service, integrity, and collaboration turned into a daily exercise in frustration, disillusionment, and navigating an unhealthy work culture. Leadership & Management: The leadership lacked transparency, accountability, and genuine engagement with staff. Decisions were often made arbitrarily or politically, with little to no input from frontline employees. Supervisors were either disengaged or micromanaging, and rarely set a clear example of ethical or effective leadership. Culture & Environment: The workplace culture was discouraging and, at times, hostile. Favoritism was commonplace, and those who asked questions or tried to improve processes were often sidelined. Morale was consistently low, and burnout was widespread. Employees were not valued for their contributions—only for their compliance. Professional Development: Opportunities for growth were minimal unless you were part of the “in-group.” Talent and effort were not recognized; instead, advancement often depended on who you knew rather than what you accomplished. Constructive feedback was rare, and honest conversations were discouraged. Work-Life Balance: Despite claims of flexibility and balance, the reality was long hours, shifting priorities, and unrealistic expectations. There was little support for managing workloads or mental health, and speaking up often led to subtle forms of retaliation. Final Thoughts: Working in public service should be meaningful and impactful. Unfortunately, in this particular environment, systemic issues made it difficult to stay motivated or feel respected. I would caution anyone considering a role here to ask direct questions about leadership, turnover, and employee satisfaction before accepting a position.

3.0
May 5, 2025

Mid

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Offers emote opportunities, and solid entry base

Cons

Very tight raise and bonus structure, sneaky leadership

Viewing 142 - 144 of 2,790 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,989 Guidehouse reviews submitted anonymously by Guidehouse employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Guidehouse is right for you.