Hopper reviews

I’d strongly advise looking elsewhere unless you’re in dire need of a paycheck. What was once a promising OTA, attracting top talent from industry giants like Expedia and Booking.com, has unraveled due to continuous leadership changes and inexperienced decision-makers at the helm. The company’s fintech ambitions, once a differentiator, have faltered under leadership that lacks the necessary engineering and product expertise to drive true innovation in travel technology. Instead of establishing a unique position in the travel ecosystem, Hopper has become primarily a redistributor of inventory. The hotel supply team, led by Luca Parducci and Susan Ho, has struggled to implement effective revenue development and supply strategies, leading to misallocated resources and missed opportunities. Rather than creating something groundbreaking, leadership has poured capital into replicating established OTAs’ strategies—only to fall short repeatedly. This cycle of missteps has led to increasing customer churn, forcing the company into regular “restructurings” as a desperate attempt to appear profitable. Ultimately, the root of Hopper’s decline lies in Fred Lalonde’s poor leadership choices, beginning with Dakota Smith’s tenure, which was more about creating a "cool kids club" at the top rather than fostering true industry expertise and innovation. This insular leadership style has led to misguided strategies, misallocated resources, and a toxic culture that stifles dissent. If current trends persist, acquisition seems increasingly likely. Proceed with caution.