employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Library of Congress

Is this your company?

Library of Congress reviews

3.7

74% would recommend to a friend

(183 total reviews)
avatar

Carla Hayden

90% approve of CEO

62% positive business outlook

Library of Congress has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 183 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Library of Congress employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Arts, Entertainment & Recreation industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

183 reviews
2.0
Sep 30, 2018

National treasure. Doesn't treasure employees.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

World's biggest library. Good salary.

Cons

Zero work life balance. Lots of incompetent life-long employees. Antiquated policies. Union hinders rather than helps progress with HR issues. For an incredibly diverse organization, treats women, particularly mid-career women, and non-Christians terribly.

5.0
Apr 15, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Intelligent colleagues who care about their work and a collegial atmosphere. CRS pays very well and it isn't that hard to get promoted to the GS-14 and 15 level, compared to other places. The work is interesting and important, you feel like you are making a difference to Congress when they are listening.

Cons

The senior management (at CRS) recently changed, but when I was there people were not happy with the way they were running things. No ability to work from home, very little flexibility, sometimes we felt like we were treated like schoolchildren rather than respected professionals.

1.0
Mar 8, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Being able to work closely with Congressional staff and be involved in the legislative process. -Access to the LOC's collections and academic databases.

Cons

Working at CRS was the worst professional experience of my 20 year career, and I would recommend avoiding the agency unless you are in a desperate financial situation. The agency's dysfunctions are tragic, as it is falling far short of its ability to provide the Congress with the expertise and policy analysis it needs. Working at CRS felt like joining a 600 person dysfunctional university faculty. Your colleagues will be brilliant, but so much of your time will be spent navigating: 1) the egos of longtime analysts, and 2) an overly complicated and sclerotic bureaucracy -- both of which will make it much more difficult for you to deliver useful and timely analysis to Congress. Internal to CRS, relationships between managers and employees are often strained, in large part because of the agency's Kafkaesque promotion process and because senior managers adopt a shoot-the-messenger approach to constructive feedback. The leadership of CRS is also vehemently opposed to telework, and is doing everything it can to limit employees from working from home, which has also been a drag on morale throughout the agency. Finally, the agency's technology is *comically* bad, despite the fact that Congress has provided the agency with multimillion dollar appropriations to deal with the issue. Throughout COVID, the entire agency would be knocked offline frequently for hours due to problems with the agency's VPN and network drives, and it took over a year for solutions to be developed.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 183 Reviews

Glassdoor has 265 Library of Congress reviews submitted anonymously by Library of Congress employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Library of Congress is right for you.