employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Library of Congress

Is this your company?

Library of Congress reviews

3.7

74% would recommend to a friend

(183 total reviews)
avatar

Carla Hayden

90% approve of CEO

62% positive business outlook

Library of Congress has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 183 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Library of Congress employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Arts, Entertainment & Recreation industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

183 reviews
4.0
Apr 18, 2018

Specialist

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Largest library in the world with staff dedicated to carrying out its incredible mission Excellent pay and benefits, depending on your GS level, with opportunities for flex schedules and teleworking, depending on your duties and assignment area

Cons

Some staff should have retired years ago but won't leave because their jobs are their lives Some of the newer hires in senior positions lack the experience, professionalism and passion for the institution needed to step into leadership roles and fill knowledge gaps when retirements do occur

1.0
Jan 25, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Check comes on time - Okay pay - Good benefits - People at GS-11 and above seemed to enjoy their jobs well enough

Cons

- Depressing, dirty, poorly lit, horribly disorganized work environment with numerous health hazards (mold, insects, broken equipment, etc.). I dealt with numerous health problems and injuries as a direct result of working there, as did several of my other coworkers. When I attempted to get management to address these things they told me the problems couldn't be fixed or ignored me entirely. - While pay was good relative to similar positions elsewhere, it was not enough to live in DC. - Management was demeaning and told me from the first time we met that I wasn't actually wanted there, even when I consistently put in high stats and yielded exceptionally good results by their own admission. Other coworkers confirmed that they had similar difficulties. - Management made racist and/or ableist comments about other staff members on a regular, frequent basis. - Training was virtually nonexistent, meaning that not only would you be reprimanded for not meeting your supervisor's unstated expectations but also that nobody knew how to do even the most basic aspects of the job properly. - External threats were poorly handled. I won't talk about ones that happened before my time as I only heard about them after the fact, but while I was there a bomb threat occurred and due to a mix of miscommunication and broken PA systems multiple coworkers were left stuck in the building during evacuation. We were expected to come in and work normal hours the next day with practically no check-ins or follow up from management except for an email acknowledging that we were probably traumatized from the previous day (they were correct!).

3.0
Dec 29, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

At its best, CRS is a very rewarding place to work. We work directly with Congressional members and staff and get a first person view of the policy making process. As a public policy or subject matter expert, this is as close as you can get to informing top policy makers without working in a political or lobbying position.

Cons

The current upper level management (division directors and above) actively resist employee development, preferring to hire from the outside almost without exception. Grad recruit and research assistant turnover is through the roof. Interns are unlikely to ever be brought back for a paid position. Qualified analysts are put into extended “temporary management” positions, before management hires from outside the organization. The “Senior Specialists” are a mixed bag. Most are either failed managers or long term analysts with no people skills. They often end up calling the shots as the upper management hires section managers from outside the organization. The Law division has developed a management culture that resists any collaboration, which can make it difficult to write on topics where legal analysis is required (quite often given the line of work!). At their worst, the upper management work behind employee’s backs, giving them encouragement and good performance reviews face to face, then never promoting or otherwise rewarding good work.

Viewing 7 - 9 of 183 Reviews

Glassdoor has 265 Library of Congress reviews submitted anonymously by Library of Congress employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Library of Congress is right for you.