employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

LogRhythm

Now known as Exabeam

Is this your company?

LogRhythm Software Engineer reviews

1.8

30% would recommend to a friend

(7 total reviews)
avatar

Chris O’Malley

Not enough data to show CEO approval

Reviews by job title

7 reviews
1.0
Feb 2, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Interesting tech and domain space * Office perks (free soda, free food Fridays, fun events) * Reasonable benefits (401k, health) * Funding granted for a greenfield/nextgen product * New CEO has strong vision and influence in sales and marketing

Cons

LogRhythm was acquired by a private equity firm. With that acquisition came major leadership changes. These leaders have been striving toward big changes in engineering, but have gone about it very poorly and caused mass attrition within the last year. Below are my observations of the Engineering Leadership: Does not value people ———————————— * Leadership rarely held 1:1’s with people reporting directly to them * Many promotions have come as a response to all of the attrition instead of being aware of the actual career development of people * Leadership gave a review here referring to ex-employees as “snakes”. Regardless of the reviews these people wrote, is that the kind of maturity and poise you want in a leader? Many very talented, passionate, and smart people worked here, the least a leader can do is be respectful * Regularly would cancel scheduled fireside chats and meetings without the courtesy of an explanation. This simply demonstrated a lack of care for people’s time and interest * Once new greenfield plan was announced, it included hiring 80% of new roles to contractors Incompetent ———————————— * Leadership gave a review saying “Boulder is a nice place, but talent is lacking”, which just shows their lack of awareness to the talent that is in Boulder (and lack of awareness to how fast rumor spreads in the tech world of Boulder) * There were some honest and open conversations with leadership, but they acted “shocked” people felt this way. They were unaware (or turned a blind eye?) to the problems brewing in the org Not trustworthy ———————————— * good at meeting external deadlines (board presentations, business reviews), but very poor at meeting internally communicated deadlines (hiring timelines, org changes, process changes, etc) * conducted the interview process of new hires in a very secluded fashion; hired people into teams without including the team in the process to be considerate of culture fit

5.0
Jan 17, 2020

Making Positive Changes

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company culture is wonderful. You can tell they recognize that people are people, so there's a lot of flexibility. There are also a lot of perks (Free lunches every Friday, free soda, frequent happy hours and coffee trucks, etc.) In Engineering specifically, I really like the direction the org is going. I've been here a little less than a year and there's been a lot of changes (so there's a good amount of change fatigue), but the intent behind the changes is good and I think it will really make us better long term. The leadership team across Engineering and Product are working really hard to get aligned and to align the teams, which is no easy task. Once we get through this chaotic phase where we're all learning and adjusting to these changes, we'll be in a great spot as Developers.

Cons

The engineering teams are spread across several locations, which can make "Agility" a little tough, but almost all companies have that set-up these days.

1.0
Nov 14, 2019

Steer clear!

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Business area and mission are compelling; engineering is so disorganized that you can do what you want, get paid, and there are no consequences. Funding secured for a next-gen product. Existing SIEM product still makes money for the company. Company once had a great culture.

Cons

Massive attrition since 2018 (many employees in engineering left; taking their knowledge/experience with them). Very poor leadership/direction; lack of organization and constant “emergencies” lead to poor solutions/repeated work. The SIEM is a poor quality software product, fully of legacy code and tech debt (e.g. VB/goto statements; core logic with no tests; heavy business logic in DB). Engineers spend a lot of time supporting the product in the field. Next-gen product engineers will be largely outsourced, leaving long-time on-shore engineers with maintenance work. Previous CEO was fired, which hurt morale. When the new executives were asked about attrition/retention, opinion was “Don’t let the door hit you on the way out” New executives in engineering cleared out experienced engineers and brought in people from their previous company (one of whom was rejected by interviewers and hired anyway), which demonstrated a lack of trust for current employees; almost like they blamed us for the state of the current product (which we had kept alive despite the tech debt that we inherited). When asked pointed questions about our future, management spouts BS as if we’re unintelligent and can’t see through it. Constant secrecy, lack of transparency, environment of mistrust, and condescension. New management style is dictatorial. New marketing of “unlimited data” is a scam; the product is limited in what it can handle adequately; they’re just no longer charging for it. It’s a matter of time before LogRhythm collapses completely.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 7 Reviews

Glassdoor has 290 LogRhythm reviews submitted anonymously by LogRhythm employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if LogRhythm is right for you.