MITRE reviews

3.2

49% would recommend to a friend

(502 total reviews)
avatar

Mark Peters

73% approve of CEO

22% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

502 reviews

Reviews about "Compensation"

Return to all reviews
1.0
Oct 9, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If work-life balance and financial stability are your priorities, this company could be a great fit. They offer up to a 10% 401A/B match, which is generous compared to industry standards. Many positions pay well, with salaries often exceeding $80K for early-career professionals, and it’s not uncommon for compensation to reach well into the six figures. Job security is strong, and it’s rare for employees to be let go. Many people stay for 20+ years, making it a great place to settle down, especially for those approaching retirement or raising children. The stability and flexibility allow you to explore side projects or even a side gig without fear of jeopardizing your main source of income.

Cons

For early-career professionals who prioritize growth and advancement, I would not recommend this company unless it’s your first role after graduating. Experience gained outside the organization is extremely undervalued, and you essentially have to restart your career. When interviewing for projects, your previous experience is often dismissed with comments like, “but it wasn’t done at MITRE.” The career structure is shaped like an hourglass. There’s a large population of early-career employees and highly experienced professionals, but very few mid-career staff. While not inherently negative, this creates challenges for career growth. Opportunities for advancement are limited unless you have strong connections, and navigating the internal politics becomes essential. Many employees leave after reaching a senior position (Step 3) due to the lack of further advancement opportunities. The company seems to have little incentive to change this, as early-career staff are often given more routine tasks, while senior employees tend to hold on to meaningful projects. Additionally, during the last year of the previous CEO’s tenure, benefits were cut in an effort to control costs. However, it was revealed that the CEO’s total compensation nearly tripled—from $1 million to $2.9 million—leaving many employees feeling disillusioned. A significant drawback is the enforced return to the office policy, despite the fact that most projects are conducted remotely, with team members located across the U.S. This shift can be frustrating for those who have adapted to the flexibility of remote work, especially when the nature of the work does not necessitate being onsite.

5.0
Oct 4, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Almost 2 years ago, the CEO and the head of HR removed an extra 4 days PTO for employees who had been here for 9+ years, and shuffled around holidays/PTO such that employees who were here for < 9 years got the same number of holidays and PTO days (but slightly more flexibility). The head of HR gaslighted the company by claiming it as a win -- that 65% of the company had a net improvement in leave benefits. Employees asked for insight and what the other cost-saving options were, no clear answers were ever given. Last year, the company changed who manages our absence codes, which required our parental and caregiver leaves to be charged in full-day increments instead of the former hour increment charging. A clear decrease in flexibility and utility of these leaves. Employees again voiced their concerns and corporate shrugged it off as a non-issue. Many good people have left, not only because of the benefits reduction but because of the corporate gaslighting around these changes. A new CEO came onboard 1 month ago, talked (and listened) to hundreds of employees. He just announced that the company is reverting all these changes because he values rewarding tenured employees and enabling flexibility of employees. Definitely a good sign of things to come. Thanks Mark!

Cons

No incentives to hire and retain cleared staff. This has been a problem for years, exacerbated by COVID and hybrid work policies. Employees who work regularly (4-5 days a week) in a cleared space should be rewarded with incentives like quarterly bonuses for maintaining clearances, subsidized commuting costs, and extra PTO; many companies already have these benefits. These incentives would make a strong statement from corporate that those employees are valued. In our current system, most staff avoid cleared work because of the lack of flexibility and work environment and increased reporting and compliance requirements. Much of the company has complained about the several failed RTO policy attempts that have required no more than 50% in office for most employees while a small set of thankless cleared employees continue on in-office close to 100% of the time.

5.0
Oct 3, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Most of the things I am going to write is coming from the context of being a Software Engineer/technical professional at MITRE. A lot of it can be generalized, but not all. Firstly, the work/life balance here at MITRE is very strong. Neither I nor anyone I've worked with thus far have reported needing to work late hours/weekends/holidays to get something done. Crunch is non-existent here. Secondly, the new CEO has recently made some big changes in support of the MITRE employees and their benefits that has reinvigorated many people's love for working at MITRE. This instills great hope in me that the future of MITRE will only get better. This brings me to my last, and arguably most important, point. The people that you are going to work with here are some of the kindest, most cooperative, and downright awesome people you can find anywhere. There will always be some people that you don't get along with in any place you go to, but the vast majority of people I have met so far have been agreeable, helpful, and ready to get things done. This is the place to work if your priorities for a job are serving a grander mission for the country, having opportunities to see and work on some really amazing things, not getting stuck on the same project/product for your whole career or large parts of it, and you want the opportunity to research and innovate in your field.

Cons

As with much of the public sector/public sector-adjacent work, the pay will not be as remarkable as other companies in the private industry. I still make six figures as an L1 Software Engineer which I'm very grateful for, but it's in the very low six-figures and thus not as high as some entry level SWE positions that can be seen in any of the top private tech companies. Not to discredit my own downside, but I will say that the benefits+work/life balance do outweigh the pay discrepancy in my opinion, but if the cash value of your yearly salary is what's most important, you probably won't be the most fulfilled here. (This is for prospective entry level software engineers) If your goal is to work on something very niche and you're coming in as an L1-L2, I don't think public sector work is going to be for you. The government and its contractors have many, MANY PhDs and senior level engineers that can produce very high-quality work in very niche fields. If you come here as a new professional, your goal should be to broaden your horizons as much as possible and find a field you really want to dig into, and that's true for many companies in all honesty.

Viewing 88 - 90 of 502 Reviews

Glassdoor has 3,048 MITRE reviews submitted anonymously by MITRE employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if MITRE is right for you.