Magic Leap reviews

4.0

70% would recommend to a friend

(470 total reviews)
avatar

Ross Rosenberg

62% approve of CEO

43% positive business outlook

Magic Leap has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 470 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Magic Leap employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

470 reviews
5.0
Oct 30, 2014

Really Enjoy working here

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I love the company culture, although I wish we weren't located in South Florida. Hard, engaging work.

Cons

Senior management can leave us in the dark sometimes, wish I knew what was going on in the bigger picture.

1.0
May 11, 2018

Exciting Product/Terrible Culture

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I was at ML for two years; in the early days, it was small, scrappy and exciting. It was a challenging culture but one with a lot of promise. The health benefits were great, however upper management decided to switch from a standard PTO accrual program to a "take as much as you like" type of deal at the beginning of the 2018. They knew they would be making a number of terminations throughout the company, and this was a backdoor way of getting out of termination accrual payouts. It felt underhanded and sneaky, and in no way was the Magic Leap company that I initially signed on for.

Cons

In the early years, there was such a push for product launch, product launch, product launch that the company culture and infrastructure was a mere afterthought. Efforts since have been taken in order to initiate a good culture, but too little, too late. In the thrush of a multitude of lawsuits, no internal mobility, and expectations on deliverables in an environment that fostered a "dog eat dog" type of vibe, it turned into a not-so-happy company to be a part of anymore. It's truly a shame as the product itself has a lot of promise. The company, not so much.

4.0
Nov 4, 2018

Heavily Influenced by Motorola, Blackberry, and Nokia

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* It's not a startup, so if you're into that then you might want to look elsewhere. * Amazing benefits. I honestly am not even sure how these could be better in a company this size while not being an industry leader at all in this respect. * Fantastic people all around. While there are some unpleasant people, you'd be hard-pressed to avoid finding those in a company this size. What you won't have trouble finding are incredibly kind, caring, and intelligent people. * Fantastic tech environment. The technology is very cool and ranges through so many domains. No matter what you do, you'll probably find an interesting challenge here. * Very open to experimenting with new tech. While the environment is very influenced by the local companies that were cannibalized to boost numbers, there's very little preventing anyone from exploring and experimenting with whatever they happen to want to do contrary to what you would expect from a company of this size.

Cons

* It's not a startup, but pretends it is to justify crunch. * Huge segments of the population in HQ are from Motorola and Blackberry. This plays into how lots of people regard the product, its development, and office politics. You'll find very quickly that the product is often regarded in similar terms as an Android phone. Many of the project managers and senior leadership often refer back to their previous work experience for examples as to how to develop the product itself, and you may find that (like myself) you disagree with this approach. * Like any organization of this size, politics runs rampant. There are massive slowdowns in hiring in certain segments, and we frequently lose prospective employees because our process did not grow as fast as we hired. These growing pains have formed cracks throughout the organization which so many things fall through. * Software seems incredibly segregated and divorced from business development and QA. QA is treated like the company whipping post being horrendously understaffed and completely isolated from the rest of software: an organizational hierarchy that is obviously taken from Motorola/Blackberry/Nokia. Our devops/build team is also horrendously understaffed and so much of the day to day of a developer may be spent dealing with breakages that wouldn't occur if we had a coherent organization and developer-oriented testing mindset. * Crunch is regarded as a cost of doing business rather than a management failure. * The aforementioned growing pains are only made worse by the open attitude with regards to experimentation with tech. The company is divided on the simplest of things like what video conferencing tool is used, what chat tool is used, how official announcements are made, etc. While half of the company uses Slack and the other half uses Google Hangouts, it's not seen as any particular issue with senior leadership expressing both there and in more important aspects that "developer freedom" trumps any other concern. * Generally all of the cons described here _will never change_. There's a lot of room for personal growth and development. There's a lot of room for influencing the company culture in very _public_ ways or in ways which reflect on our vision of ourselves, but not in any actual _tangible_ way in my opinion. * At least one member of senior leadership is infamous for being incredibly rude and uncaring (to put it kindly). If you are in software, you will quickly learn that most of software is alternately terrified of him or otherwise forced to satisfy his whims over the health of the product or their own emotional/mental health. In my opinion, he is the single most destructive force in the company and he has either the complete and total support of senior leadership because of past experience at older companies (see previous remarks) or because senior leadership is just that divorced from the actual organizational control structures throughout the company. Many, _many_ people have left the company citing him as their reason. * IT is horrendously mismanaged, in my opinion, being reduced largely to triage and onboarding. Many of the bureaucratic political issues that I've previously described hurt IT. * If you're in HQ, then Florida is an interesting place. It has its pros and cons, the biggest one being that there's basically no other opportunities in the area. So if you come out here, do so either with the expectation that you're going to move _back_ to a tech hub at some point or you've decided to make Magic Leap your career for the foreseeable future. But if you're coming, don't expect to find anything else in the area when you want to move on.

Viewing 16 - 18 of 470 Reviews

Glassdoor has 561 Magic Leap reviews submitted anonymously by Magic Leap employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Magic Leap is right for you.