Mathematica reviews

3.1

46% would recommend to a friend

(172 total reviews)
avatar

Paul Decker

23% approve of CEO

17% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

172 reviews

Reviews about "Culture"

Return to all reviews
3.0
Jun 29, 2026

Smart colleagues and impactful work hindered by poor leadership

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart people, impactful work. A real community.

Cons

Poor strategic planning. Rather than performing real analysis and proactive thinking, leadership reacts to the environment. Strategy development and implementation at Mathematica seems like leadership throws wet spaghetti against the wall to see what sticks. In the 2010s, it was predictive modeling. Rather than proactively using predictive modeling to support their client's goals and the organization's mission, they created a data analytics division, hired smart people, and provided no guidance to support the division. Today, AI has replaced predictive modeling. These examples provide two instances of failures of corporate leadership; many more exist. Unfortunately, the company suffers from short-term incentives and an aversion to long-term investments. As an employee-owned company, you would think that the board and leadership would be more responsive to the employees. No! Over time, they have removed employees' voices from decision-making and focused on increasing their own power and independence.

1.0
May 29, 2026

Do what you can with what little there is.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are times when you are on a project and the Project Director is a good person, a good leader, and a good colleague who has somehow successfully managed to avoid adopting the toxic practices/behaviors reinforced by "Leadership." The flexibility to work remotely and flex hours is really world class.

Cons

Generally, I have not considered the environment to be toxic or the work culture to be toxic. Before this year, the recent re-org, and the RIFs, I would have said that there are toxic individuals or toxic clients, but not a toxic organizational culture. At halfway through 2026, it's impossible to maintain that perspective. Every single person I interact with, regardless of unit or job scope, across the entire global and US-facing matrix, are on the job market. The exceptions are those individuals in "Leadership," the ones creating the toxicity who have risen up because the best have left. In this environment when jobs are scarce, if you receive an offer to work here, negotiate to the absolute maximum value of the salary band then bide your time until the labor market loosens up.

2.0
May 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The pay was good and the benefits were fine to good.

Cons

Horrible management that has not been up to navigating challenging circumstances since at least mid-2024. Very slow to change or adapt because there's a culture there that Mathematica's approach is superior to anyone else's. They rely on their approach - which has been successful, but is not adaptable to changing circumstances - to their detriment. Competitors were incorporating AI powered tools years ago - but Mathematica was SURE that its way was the right way. OOPS! Nearly 40% of the staff was laid off - but, incredibly, no one in senior management was. The way the layoffs were handled and the treatment of former employees subsequently has generated deep bitterness - and led to many former employees working to help competitors take work away from Mathematica, a task made easier by Mathematica's slow pace of reform and change.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 172 Reviews

Glassdoor has 601 Mathematica reviews submitted anonymously by Mathematica employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Mathematica is right for you.