Morgan Stanley reviews

3.9

76% would recommend to a friend

(19,824 total reviews)
avatar

Ted Pick

80% approve of CEO

73% positive business outlook

Morgan Stanley has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 19,824 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Morgan Stanley employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Financial Services industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

20K reviews
1.0
Nov 13, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company made this seem like a great career move, decent benefits, okay salary. They promised a trip to New York. They make some enticing promises.

Cons

The company misled me about the duration of the background check, telling me in March it would take 2-4 weeks. Then they said it in June, July, August... I passed background, however they starved me for months on false promises, and they were doing background checks well past the employment offer date. Then they acted like I was at fault. This is the most dishonorable company I have ever had the displeasure of working with.

3.0
Jan 30, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent, technical and dedicated employees. Competent middle management. Good benefits. Overall good place to "settle down" with if you don't mind typical corporate politics and the faceless corporate agenda that will always put shareholders before employees.

Cons

Salaries are below market price. Compensation is based on a "Total Compensation" concept which is Base + Cash Bonus = Total Comp. In practice this means that your Base is at or below market price with the promise of a cash bonus at year end. HR plays percentage games because Total Comp has caps for each level. Typically, Base grows at the expense of Bonus and total comp can stay flat for 3-5 years depending on market and on personal career trajectory. Although bumps typically happen following a promotion, this is not always the case. Odds are that the Firm is re-aligning earning expectations. The Big Bonus lure is a thing of the past. Those who can survive the 17-30% total comp loss as a result of this years shift can only hope for a base bump to market price in 2012. But Total Comp will not recover and you will not get "back on track". If you're in it, write this and next few years off as a loss. Culture at the Firm is still that of late 90s boom. People are expected to work hard/long hours. Now that rewards structure is diminished, there is a conflict between cultural expectations and actual rewards. This will take a few years to stabilize. HR will not adjust base salaries mid year unless the exodus of talent is severe enough to cause internal hemorrhaging. Given churn in the market, odds of a favorable outcome for employees are low. More on promotions. These are typically veiled in secrecy and management delivers an inconsistent message. Advice for incomers: discuss promotion process and your candidacy openly with your manager. If your manager will not have the conversation with you openly it means that she is not looking out for your career. Consider moving on. Further, promotions are retroactive. Increase in responsibilities, higher profile projects, management responsibilities typically occur 1 or 2 years before your manager will "put you up". HR defines a quota for promotions. You manager will compete against other managers for a spot. Criteria for a successful submission includes a demonstrable successful track record of delivery, mentorship, technical excellence, citizenship, etc. This is why promotions are typically a 1-3 year process from the moment that you and your manager agree that this is a year for you to be "put up". So, manage your own career and make sure you have a good manager who is taking care of you.

1.0
Sep 8, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great gym. Free parking onsite.

Cons

This review specifically applies to wealth management trading floor based primarily in Purchase that covers top Financial Advisors' UHNW, middle market and HNW Clients. The division falsely advertises itself as Capital Markets, that is NOT to be confused with the venerable Global Capital Markets desk in the city that brings deals to the market for major companies. Firstly, the horrible compensation ranges say it all: After ones first three years, compensation (both base and 'bonus') is far below street avg even within UHNW/how bucket: - Analyst ( yrs 1-3): $95k-$120k - Associate ( yrs 3-6): $110k- $160k - VP ( yrs 6-10): $110-$170k --> you are stuck now and doing exact same work as A2 ED (yrs 10- infinity): $150-$250k In the past four months alone, the unit has lost 12 of its stronger performing analysts, associates and younger vps. It even lost its HR Rep in charge of "retaining talent." One would think management would be inquisitive as to this brain drain, especially when they trumpet the wealth management's staff support's "intellectual capital" as a point of strength in helping the firms top individual Clients. But they have not nor do they seem to care. They recruit finance and Econ majors from schools like Harvard, Brown, Georgetown, BC, Nova etc, train them up over a year period, only to lose many by year three. THE ENTIRE ANALYST CLASS OF 2008 IS GONE; all left to greener pastures. Over the last four years, there has been 4 different heads of this division. That's right- MDs in charge of managing a 300 person division that produces a half billion in revenue per year just can't seem to stick around. This volatility at the top trickles down to the next rung of management (EDs and newer MDs) where a culture of solo performance, selfishness, complete lack of communication and mendacity permeates the environment. Some examples: - Multiple colleagues have told me, and I've heard it myself, that their manager told them that their performance review nor rating does NOT determine ones compensation. When pressed on what actually determines compensation, no manager has ever explained it. If for example you are a trader at the associate or vp level and produced $15MM in PnL for the year, you could very well get a 'bonus' of $20-30k pretax, and a low base; very uncompetitive for a 11 hr/day job with a 1 hr commute each way. This has occurred multiple of times to multiple ppl; don't think you'd be an exception. Regardless, no manager has ever explained the discrepancy between performance and pay. One can only infer it is because the division's management is of extremely poor quality and does not advocate senior execs on the divisions value add. - stagnate compensation between analyst-vp. Many second year analysts get paid as much if not more than first-third year vice presidents. One third year associate recently left to lesser competitor and was offered twice their MSWM capital markets total compensation. - three star associates who made VP in the last four months left to competitors after they found out their promotion came with a DROP in year on year compensation. They wete doubled at other firms. What kind of management promotes its up and coming officers only to then lower their year on year pay? Bad managers. - There is an institutional desk in the city at Broadway and 42nd- where management should encourage relationships and communication to open up, there actually is a policy that says sales staff in Purchase cannot communicate with their colleagues in the city about any market/ job related issue. - On top of a traders' PnL not being linked to anything comp related, neither are the sales force's sales commission. A sales person may do proactive trades that generate $10mm in gross credits over a year, but the managers do not attribute that work at the end of the year to that persons' efforts. Instead liken it to something that would have happened anyway. Well, what's the point of having a sales force then. If you don't believe those numbers just do a check on glassdoor but select "Purchase" as location, not nyc. If you decide to join this desk despite this warning, realize you will. E joining a glorified help desk

Viewing 4 - 6 of 19,824 Reviews

Glassdoor has 24,404 Morgan Stanley reviews submitted anonymously by Morgan Stanley employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Morgan Stanley is right for you.