Oxford University Press reviews

3.4

57% would recommend to a friend

(1,231 total reviews)
avatar

Nigel Portwood

53% approve of CEO

35% positive business outlook

Oxford University Press has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 1,231 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Oxford University Press employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Education industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
1.0
Jul 3, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some great colleagues. Many, especially the lower- and mid-level staff, are incredibly hard-working and talented. Many have also left OUP. Social events are a great opportunity to meet people and bond with colleagues.

Cons

Oxford University Press is a sinking ship. Heed the reviews on Glassdoor. Do you want to work for the lowest-rated company in the industry? Impossible workload, high turnover, complexity, layoffs, no opportunity for growth, the lowest wages in the industry, and oblivious management. This is what awaits you at OUP. It is an open secret: OUP has a huge unpaid overtime problem. Despite continually increasing workloads, my manager was not willing to adjust expectations. Many times, I was explicitly required to work unpaid overtime to complete extra work. While OUP's practice of requiring unpaid overtime work is demoralizing and illegal, what could I do? I am early in my career and wanted to keep my job. If I declined to work unpaid overtime, my manager implied they would find a reason to let me go. In the same conversation, my manager said I was "replaceable." In my time with OUP, nearly half of my department left voluntarily or was let go. The chronic turnover and budget problems mean many of these positions are permanently unfilled. Instead, their responsibilities are delegated permanently to the people who remain. As the team got smaller and smaller, the workload and stress became unmanageable. (You don't have to take my word for it; the abysmal annual employee survey results mirror my experience.) The biggest con: in this environment, there is no opportunity for growth or advancement. I am working in a dead-end position, a problem systemic to OUP. Unsurprisingly, when early-career staff are seen as "replaceable," managers fail to make even minimal investments in their staff. This not a place to learn or develop your career. To the OUP staff now monitoring this site, do not bother replying that you are "concerned" to hear about my individual experience. This is not news. Most nonexempt employees in my department work chronic unpaid overtime in positions without even basic advancement opportunities, and every manager is complicit in this. Realistically, there is nothing we could have done to change this situation that would not have hurt our careers. If a company must resort to unethical and illegal practices to sustain itself, it should no longer exist. And as this is the cost of doing business with OUP, I recommend you don't. Avoid the sinking ship that is Oxford University Press.

avatar
Oxford University Press Response
8y
We have a variety of processes, safeguards, and training programmes in place to enforce our explicit zero-tolerance policy against unpaid overtime for non-exempt employees (meaning “those who are eligible for overtime pay at both the federal and state level in the USA”). If a manager is requiring a non–exempt employee to work unrecorded time, and we cannot see it in our pay records, we must rely on the employees reporting this to management or HR so it can be investigated and remediated. We investigate every single instance of unrecorded time and will take immediate action if we find that a manager is not conforming to our policies. You mention that you felt that nothing could be done that would not hurt you career. We don’t tolerate retaliation in any form, and will work with you to get this resolved, but we do need you to follow our existing procedure for reporting any such instances since we cannot address your concerns without specifics. Please contact Rosann Ashe, Vice President of HR, or, Niko Pfund President of OUP USA directly, and in confidence, so immediate action can be taken. You can also reach out to our confidential external helpline: oup@expolink.co.uk
1.0
Apr 12, 2018

PAINFUL

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some great coworkers at the entry and mid-career levels

Cons

Downgrading my previous review from two stars to one (I would give zero stars if that were allowed). We continue to be stretched further and further - less staff, tighter and tighter budgets, more forms and nonsensical systems - while being asked to create more content in more formats. That alone is difficult to manage, especially for editorial staff that cares deeply about the quality of their work. However, on top of this, managers and directors are harsh and belittle people at their whim. They spend their time building factions and bullying people rather than doing actual work and learning what their teams are actually doing. Responses to suggestions for improvement are met with more ridiculous top-down demands and initiatives. Despite constantly negatively reviews and survey results, management will not really listen. They don't involve their employees in coming up with solutions so they just bog us down further with more recycled bad ideas.

avatar
Oxford University Press Response
8y
We are sorry to hear that you have had a negative experience at OUP. We’re really keen to hear more from our employees to understand where we can make improvements, so encourage you to get in touch and tell us more about the challenges you’ve highlighted in your review. You can contact us by emailing glassdoor@oup.com. We also have a zero tolerance policy around bullying, so if this is something you have experienced or witnessed, please report it to our confidential helpline – OUP@expolink.com.
1.0
Feb 3, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

It can be a casual environment, especially if your manager is remote. Network/Friends - People are under so much stress, that you can bond really closely. A lot of people move to NY, and you’ll feel like you made friends fast. Then when your friends leave OUP, you now have a great network. We help each other get out, and it’s very common for former OUP employees to continue working together at other companies. Honestly this was my strategy coming in, and it worked. But it doesn’t work for everyone. *caveat: turnover is so high that some people don’t bother getting to know the new assistants. They’ll be gone in 6-11 months, and it’s exhausting. The Oxford brand - it sounds impressive on your resume, especially if you want to work at a smaller academic press or in education. If you want to work in publishing, there can be barriers transitioning from academic/higher ed to trade books. In those cases, people usually take an assistant level job at a different publisher (often a step down if they’ve been promoted at OUP), but some end up really happy at their subsequent company. Publishing knows how crappy OUP is, and they know people at OUP know how to work hard. In Summer 2019, a few of the most infamous sexual harassers/managers were let go (which in itself was a miracle because assistants had been reporting them for 20 years). It’s a weird culture because it feels like almost all of of the assistants are young women and almost all of the editors/managers are middle aged men. Although there are women in middle management, the men hold the authority. Some people like it at OUP. If you figure out how to emotionally detach, compartmentalize, and protect your personal time, you’ll be fine. Bagel Friday - although they’ve been cutting back on this recently to save money, which is concerning. Brown bananas aren’t healthy, they’re just cheap. They never got enough bagels in the first place - they’re gone by 9:15. Work somewhere else, and afford your own bagels.

Cons

Salary is unlivable in NYC. No one can do it without support from their parents or spouse, or a second job. This makes diversity impossible. Terrible health care. They’ll say they have tuition reimbursement, but they won’t give it to you. Layoffs - you might be next. The 60 people laid off this week have more time to pack their things, but usually people are forced out in the same work day that they get the news. Then their work is dumped on people who are kept. Hiring freezes - turnover is high, people leave all the time. And spanning months, the company has hiring freezes, where they refused to fill these empty positions. Their workload gets dumped on the remaining team. Everyone at OUP is juggling 2 full time workloads, at a minimum. Even when there’s not a hiring freeze, they’re EXTREMELY slow to hire mid and upper level positions. It’s 8-12 months of an assistant doing the work of their former manager or director, with no compensation in title or salary. I’ve heard sometimes they’ll give one $500 bonus, which after tax, isn’t nearly proportional to the workload. An assistant’s experience is entirely dictated by their manager. A few managers are wonderful, but they don’t tend to stick around long because they’re actually capable of getting out. Often they are forced out because they know they’re overworked and doing a good job, so they’ll ask for a raise/promotion, and they won’t get it. Then they leave, and the assistant is stuck doing both jobs. The bad managers get stuck there, and for some bizarre reason upper management seems hell bent on keeping the worst offenders. Experiences can vary, but expect to be yelled at, belittled, and thrown under the bus. No one is taught how to do anything, and then you get yelled at when the work lacks very ridged specifications. Less common: harassment. Most situations toe that line of “is this worth reporting?” and then “will there be repercussions if I do report?”. In the past, reporting assistants had been fired or shuffled to a different manager with nothing happening to the offending manager. Recently that’s been changing (see the pro for more details), but you will need multiple witnesses. I think the most common issue is general nastiness and incompetence at the mid/upper-level. Performance plans - less common, used as a tool to set impossible standards for a single employee, and then fire that person when these “expectations” aren’t met, after a boss has decided he doesn’t like the employee. I’ve seen this happen to both assistants and managers. Frustrating that they kept people who are much less competent than the employees they fired. Depending on the department, it can feel nearly impossible to get promoted. More commonly, people get promoted once and then it’s nearly impossible to get promoted a second time. On the flip side, I know 3 people who turned down promotions because of workload concerns and dealing with big personalities. The Diversity Committee is straight white women, who are upset with the straight white men who run the company (justifiably). Then nothing happens because of the limitations set on the committee by the straight white men. They do not care. This sounds obvious, but people have walked into HR sobbing, and they won’t acknowledge the issue or follow up.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 1,231 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,504 Oxford University Press reviews submitted anonymously by Oxford University Press employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Oxford University Press is right for you.