Paylocity reviews

3.1

46% would recommend to a friend

(3,238 total reviews)
avatar

Toby Williams

47% approve of CEO

40% positive business outlook

Paylocity has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 3,238 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Paylocity employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
3.0
Jun 22, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pay is decent considering what other customer/client service jobs are paying. You get benefits on day one of starting. Your co-workers are awesome and the direct managers are easy to work with.

Cons

If you're considering joining the team...somethings to think about. The EAM team workload is increasing. We have a dedicated base to service, but have to be in a phone queue, which can often get hectic (especially towards the end/ beginning of a quarter and/or year). Leadership may try to make it seem like it's not that bad during the interview process...but when you start getting messages about your adherence cause of the workload you're under...it becomes that serious. You do have an hour off the phones to work on projects, but...will likely need to stay after your shift to finish up work. You will need to be in role 12-18 months before you can switch to another role within the company.

avatar
Paylocity Response
1y
Thank you for taking the time to share your experience. It’s clear you care about the work, your clients, and your team, and that doesn’t go unnoticed. We’re glad to hear you’ve built strong relationships with your coworkers and that your direct leaders have created a supportive environment. We also hear your perspective on the EAM team’s workload and the challenges of balancing client calls with project work. Your feedback helps us take a closer look at how we’re supporting our people in delivering great service while maintaining a manageable workload. Career growth and internal mobility continue to be top priorities at Paylocity, and we’re constantly evaluating how we can provide more transparent and accessible paths forward. We appreciate you using your voice and encourage you to keep the conversation going with your leader or People Relations Partner, they’re here to support you.
2.0
May 4, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They use to have so many but now I’m at a loss to find one

Cons

Pretty much everything No work life balance Over worked, understaffed Was hired for a remote position and now am being forced back into the office

avatar
Paylocity Response
1y
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We understand that the shift in our in-office policy has been challenging for some. This decision was made thoughtfully, as we believe in-person collaboration strengthens team connections, enhances client experiences, and supports career growth. We remain focused on supporting our teams through this transition and encourage you to reach out to your leader for any questions or support. We also hear your concerns about workload and recognition. We encourage you to continue the conversation with your leader, as your feedback is important and helps us continue to improve. Thank you again for taking the time to share it.
1.0
Apr 25, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexibility of being 100% remote.

Cons

As a former Talent Acquisition Partner at Paylocity, my experience was significantly impacted by a troubling combination of toxic culture, poor leadership, and an unhealthy emphasis on numbers at the expense of true talent acquisition practices. While Paylocity positions itself as a leader in the HR tech space, my time there revealed several fundamental issues that need serious attention for the company to fully realize its potential. 1. Toxic Culture and Favoritism- one of the most disheartening aspects of my time at Paylocity was the pervasive toxic culture. From the outset, it became clear that certain employees were treated more favorably than others, often regardless of merit or performance. Favoritism was a recurring issue, with some individuals receiving preferential treatment, and opportunities based on personal relationships with higher-ups rather than on competence or hard work which at times seemed like a sorority. This created an environment of inequality and frustration, particularly for those of us who were trying to build careers based on skill and dedication. 2. Leadership Focused on Numbers, Not Quality Talent- a significant challenge at Paylocity was and is the leadership's laser focus on hiring numbers, without any real concern for identifying and attracting quality talent. There was an emphasis on meeting monthly hiring metrics that we, as Talent Acquisition Partners, had little control over. These metrics often felt arbitrary, and were largely disconnected from the true needs of the business. We were held accountable for hiring goals that we simply could not manipulate or influence—after all, we cannot force candidates to accept offers. If a hiring goal was missed in any given month, we were quickly labeled as underperformers or, worse, incompetent, even when external factors—like candidate market conditions or candidate rejections—were beyond our control. The entire process became a numbers game, reducing talent acquisition to a transactional activity rather than a strategic, thoughtful effort to align the right people with the right roles. 3. Lack of Accountability from Leadership- another frustrating aspect was the lack of accountability from leadership. Team leads and senior leaders alike rarely took responsibility for missed goals, poor decision-making, or the broader challenges faced by their teams. There was a pattern of deflecting blame to individual contributors, even though leadership often failed to provide the necessary resources or guidance to help teams meet their goals. They weren't and aren't qualified to lead TA teams and even had multiple HR complaints made on them as leaders, but nothing is ever done. Instead of seeing us as true partners in the business, we were treated as mere cogs in a machine—a number to be scrutinized for the inability to force candidates to take astronomical pay cuts (due to the below market value they offered), control of their family emergencies, or personal records that impacted their background checks from clearing in time. This lack of leadership accountability and empathy further contributed to a toxic, disengaged culture that created an environment of working out of fear. 4. Inefficient Processes and Lack of Support- the company's overall lack of efficient processes and communication added to the frustration. Many teams, including Talent Acquisition, were left to navigate unclear expectations and ambiguous processes, ridiculous internal meetings, leading to confusion and burnout. The constant changes in direction, often without clear communication from leadership, made it difficult to do the job effectively and led to further inefficiencies. While Paylocity offers a promising product and has the potential to be a great place to work, my experience as a Talent Acquisition Partner was ultimately a disappointing one that I would NOT recommend my worst enemy for. The negative aspects of the culture—marked by favoritism, a lack of accountability, a narrow focus on numbers over quality talent, and ineffective leadership—created an environment that hindered both personal and professional growth. If Paylocity were to address these fundamental issues and take a more holistic, thoughtful approach to leadership and talent acquisition, I believe it could become a much stronger organization. But as it stands, the focus on numbers and failure to value true partnership in business hampers its overall success.

Viewing 451 - 453 of 3,238 Reviews

Glassdoor has 3,294 Paylocity reviews submitted anonymously by Paylocity employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Paylocity is right for you.