Pros
The job itself is rewarding, and most coworkers are supportive and hardworking. Patient care can be very fulfilling when the environment allows you to do your job properly.
Cons
Management is the biggest issue here, and it directly impacts both staff and patient safety. Communication is extremely poor to the point of being unsafe. Employees are required to follow strict policies about letting only verified personnel into the building, yet management fails to inform staff when vendors or contractors are scheduled. This creates a situation where literally anyone could walk in claiming to be authorized. Staffing is consistently inadequate. Staff, especially technologists are overworked and underpaid, which has led to ongoing turnover. Instead of fixing the root problem, leadership relies on travel staff—even when there are clear concerns about quality of care. In at least one case, serious issues with a technologist’s professionalism and performance were reported multiple times, and leadership’s response was essentially that “something is better than nothing.” That mindset is unacceptable in healthcare and puts patients at risk. There is also a pattern of poor and unprofessional treatment of staff. Employees who raise legitimate concerns about workload or patient care are often singled out or treated negatively. Decisions are made based on rumors rather than facts, and there is little accountability when management handles situations poorly. Employee feedback is largely ignored. Company surveys have shown extremely low satisfaction in key areas like compensation and recognition, yet leadership has openly stated they will not focus on the negative results. As a result, nothing changes. Favoritism is obvious, particularly in the front office. Certain employees receive better schedules, lighter expectations, and advancement opportunities regardless of performance, while others are held to stricter standards. This creates a frustrating and inequitable work environment. Overall, there is a strong focus on numbers and volume, often at the expense of both employees and patient care. Timeline changed to avoid potential repercussions. Core details are accurate.
