Pros
What they (attempt) to do is vital and necessary - we need more transparency around the cybersecurity hygiene of companies we want to do business with, and it should be easy to get that first assessment of how good or bad a company is without much effort. They have a raft of interesting data that could be used to help everyone improve cyber hygiene - it's an ideal cybersecurity data scientist's playground. Base pay can be above market, but very expensive health plan and poor benefits.
Cons
Leadership is way, way out of their depth, and a nightmare for HR - toxic culture is framed as "radical candor". Constant demands to "10x it", and ugly outdated leadership behaviors from from Welch, Musk, Jobs and Bezos are applied randomly and without thought as to their relevance, necessity, or outcomes. Revolving door ELT - they both can't retain, and choose not to retain talent somehow replacing leaders every few months - this extends to many other roles so don't rely on vesting any equity. No EQ - employees are treated as disposable assets by the founders with no thought to personal impact. Many RIFs as others have mentioned to meet vanity business metrics, often followed by re-hire of the same roles. No commitment to roadmap, direction or strategy - business practices are still heavily driven by whatever the founders thought up the day before.