employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Selective Insurance

Engaged Employer

Selective Insurance reviews

2.7

32% would recommend to a friend

(434 total reviews)
avatar

John Marchioni

41% approve of CEO

37% positive business outlook

Selective Insurance has an employee rating of 2.7 out of 5 stars, based on 434 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Selective Insurance employee rating is 25% below average for employers within the Insurance industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

434 reviews
1.0
Mar 20, 2026

Overworked and Under-Supported, Despite Ambition

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Talented and collaborative co-workers who make the day-to-day work enjoyable. Hybrid schedule provides flexibility and some work-life balance. Leadership shows ambition and willingness to try new initiatives and programs. Town halls with the CEO provide transparency and the opportunity to ask questions directly.

Cons

Morale is declining rapidly, driven by leadership instability and lack of support. Managers are stepping down at an alarming rate, and many employees are avoiding leadership roles altogether. The company frequently rolls out multiple initiatives without clear direction, adequate resources, or realistic expectations. Regional teams are especially impacted, expected to absorb this work without sufficient support, which leads to burnout. There are not enough underwriting or operational roles within the regions to sustain these initiatives. Operational infrastructure is a major gap. Many regions lack dedicated support functions such as marketing, events, product, HR, IT, and design teams - forcing employees to take on significant responsibilities outside their roles without additional compensation or recognition. Career advancement opportunities in these spaces are limited, and high performers are often left in stagnant, thankless roles. Rather than developing talent, employees are often assigned expanded responsibilities beyond a sustainable capacity. Overall career development is lacking. Top performers frequently leave for higher-paying opportunities elsewhere with less stress. Processes are inefficient, and talent is often constrained by nonfunctional systems. HR is a consistent pain point. Confidentiality is a concern, support is limited, and there is a disconnect in understanding employee roles. HR often functions as a pass-through for leadership rather than a true advocate, with little innovation or modern approaches to employee development and retention. Work-life balance is poor across the organization. Expectations—especially in underwriting—are unrealistic and exhausting. Flexibility is often denied, even for reasonable schedule adjustments, despite messaging promoting a flexible culture. Upper leadership does not appear to understand the realities of working parents or the demands employees face on a daily basis with territory sizes. Processes and communication are inefficient. Vendor and contract approvals can take months, IT issues persist, and priorities frequently shift without clear communication. Goals are often unattainable, and corporate initiatives frequently overwhelm teams without proper alignment or follow-through. Many leaders feel they are simply “checking a box” for upper leadership, and frustrations are openly discussed among teams. Managers are paralyzed once in their position and have no desire to develop themselves, creating barriers for those who do - We’re losing young talent because of it. Policies are applied inconsistently. The emphasis on badge swipes and in-office tracking feels out of touch, particularly when field roles are not held to the same standards and performance or travel is ignored. While there is a sense of job security, it is overshadowed by poor communication, lack of direction, weak infrastructure, siloed leadership, a costly new corporate office location, and increasing frustration across teams.

1.0
Feb 25, 2026

Declining Culture and Lack of Clear Remote Work Policy or Equitable Practices

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mid-level leaders are working hard to protect their teams and maintain morale, even when executive decisions make that difficult. Strong peer commiseration across teams to help each other cope.

Cons

The company has undergone significant changes that have negatively impacted morale and trust in leadership. The CEO appears disconnected from the day-to-day realities employees face, particularly regarding work-life balance and commuting expectations. With the relocation from Branchville to Short Hills, many long-tenured employees are being placed in a difficult position. Unlike senior executives, most employees cannot easily afford to move closer to the new office location. The shift to increased in-office requirements feels less like a collaboration-driven initiative and more like a strategy that disproportionately impacts established team members. Work-life balance has significantly eroded. At a time when many peer organizations are adopting thoughtful hybrid and remote strategies to attract and retain talent, this company is moving in the opposite direction. This approach will likely create substantial turnover and make it challenging to fill the many roles that will become vacant. Additionally, there are inequitable practices surrounding remote work. There is no clearly defined or consistently applied remote work policy, leading to confusion and perceptions of favoritism. Expectations vary by team and individual, which undermines fairness and transparency.

5.0
Feb 10, 2026

Great culture

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great culture and pay is good. They try to promote from within as much as possible

Cons

IT, goals can change on a whim at times

Viewing 16 - 18 of 434 Reviews

Glassdoor has 490 Selective Insurance reviews submitted anonymously by Selective Insurance employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Selective Insurance is right for you.