Static Media reviews

2.7

30% would recommend to a friend

(100 total reviews)

Reggie Renner

32% approve of CEO

29% positive business outlook

Static Media has an employee rating of 2.7 out of 5 stars, based on 100 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Static Media employee rating is 27% below average for employers within the Media & Communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

100 reviews
2.0
Sep 19, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are some wonderful people at this company, and the pay for freelancers is competitive for the industry. You can climb the ladder quickly if you prove yourself.

Cons

Like many people in this company, I climbed the ladder relatively quickly, going from a freelance writer to an editor and then FT Senior Lead Editor. As soon as I became FT, however, I began to see the dark side of the company. The red flags began with the fact that I had to get trained for and then actually work the position without the promotion or salary for months, which is a regular practice here. (Scratch that -- the FIRST red flag was seeing that the entire C-suite was comprised of white, straight, men.) When I finally was "offered" the role, the salary for a FT senior position was around $48,750, and they did not accept any negotiations. Although there were benefits, the pay was equivalent to the freelance editors who had a wayyyy lighter workload. To stay in the good graces of a few rude, workaholic, money-hungry higher-ups who seemingly hold all the power, you have to be available at all hours and receive zero overtime pay for extensive after-hours work, frequently fire freelancers with little to no reason or explanation (even some who are extremely talented and hardworking and/or have a recorded history of mental or physical illness), and prove your monetary value. Because I was committed to training, mentoring, communicating with, and improving the work atmosphere for my team, I regularly received praise for my capabilities as a manager, but that didn't matter one bit to the C-suite. I also led the publication during its most profitable months of all time, but there were no performance reviews in which I could share my success. Ultimately, despite enjoying the role and many of the people there, I realized the company had a far more negative impact on my life than positive. Many of us believed the environment was toxic and wanted to get out. I began speaking up about my concerns (which is definitely looked down upon) and stopped putting in so much extra effort that I wasn't ever going to be rewarded for. Because of this, I was eventually fired, as was pretty much every kind-hearted and genuinely talented person I knew there. Overall, the company's practices are unethical, unorganized, and all-around shady. It's going to catch up with them soon.

2.0
Feb 15, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible work hours, consistent pay, being part of a team

Cons

Something is clearly wrong when they are letting go editors and writers left and right, especially when they consistently work or have worked for this company for years. You get very little feedback if any and suddenly you are let go. The way editors (specifically senior editors) talk about writers is also extremely discouraging. These people are nice to your face but talk badly behind your back. I started checking random people in higher positions when I would see comments left on Trello by people who I've never spoken to nor heard of before. It gets a bit fishy when "senior" editors are promoted after working as writers for less than a year or managers who leave numerous spelling mistakes on Trello cards just graduated college a couple of years ago and have no actual editorial experience. They don't seem to care about experience, so who knows how these people were promoted.

1.0
Jul 16, 2022

Pick An Identity

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Flexible schedule * Can work full-time * Great for quickly building portfolio

Cons

* Style guide isn’t clear. * Editors aren’t on the same page regarding the Style Guide. * Feedback and communication are passive-aggressive. * Expected content output doesn’t meet the incredibly stringent way you’re expected to put articles together. * You spend more time finding 2-4 sources per section of your article than actually writing the article.

Viewing 7 - 9 of 100 Reviews

Glassdoor has 326 Static Media reviews submitted anonymously by Static Media employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Static Media is right for you.