employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Steelwedge Software

Acquired by E2open

Is this your company?

Steelwedge Software reviews

2.9

51% would recommend to a friend

(117 total reviews)

Michael Farlekas

51% approve of CEO

40% positive business outlook

Steelwedge Software has an employee rating of 2.9 out of 5 stars, based on 117 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Steelwedge Software employee rating is 25% below average for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

117 reviews
1.0
Mar 23, 2016

Game Over for Steelwedge

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The obviously fake positive reviews posted by you-know-who are hilariously easy to spot.

Cons

Steelwedge is done. The most recent layoff expunged the last remaining US subject matter experts of the product. How am I supposed to support my accounts when clueless juniors keep giving me the runaround? The sales team - who I argue is what's been keeping the company afloat - was already decimated in the last two years. Now you take an ice cream scoop out of the brains behind the product. Weak sales team. Weak engineering team. Both appearance and substance are gone. You are doomed and you don't even know it.

avatar
Steelwedge Software Response
10y
Thank you for your feedback.
1.0
Mar 1, 2016

CEO = CE-No, How not to run a company

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

First off, the positive reviews are made up. they burry all the recent 2016 and all 2015 bad reviews. Note, new CEO entered November of 2014 so the trend of recent bad reviews are not a coincidence. Prior to the recent CEO and NEW leadership that has entered this company. It had some promise, on the way up. Steelwedge had its growing pains, but at least had relevant leadership that had a vision. Today, this company is a shadow of itself with no clear vision from this leadership. This decline started November of 2014. When your Pro's are your benefits, there is a problem. As a company, you would hope your Pros are your leadership and vision, plus the people that are trying to put everything in place. The people who are here are good people, unfortunately we are being led down an unsuccessful path. We do not live in Ruby Hill, we are hard working employees looking for some TRUE leadership and want to be a part of a winning organization.

Cons

Let's start at the top: CENo = Was once a customer, but is now our leader???? Who thought that this would be a good idea. Came in with some lofty sales goals, even brought in his team from a previous company. Well, these lofty sales goals, NOT EVEN CLOSE. Nothing wrong with previous sales leadership, we will get to the new leadership soon. As a leader, it is easy to rally your troops when things are going good. However, when you are hitting a rough patch, it says a lot about a leader to exude confidence and rally your troops to keep working for the ultimate goal. Well when the CENo decides not to address the troops at the holiday party, well, you kinda get an idea that he may not be the right man for this job. Sales Leadership = Dwelling on past success before you have an idea of the new lay of the land can come back to bite you. Funny how there was a semi full team of inside and outside sales teams when this new leadership started. Hard for a new leader to get troops to rally when you berate the existing sales team and point out that they will be shown the right way to do things. Well, when new leadership fails to produce..... You tend to blame others for your failed leadership. What do you expect to accomplish with the pipeline with new reps who don't know how to sell this product. How is sales leadership going to train, when they cannot even sell this product. A whopping 2 sales in 2015!!!!! Way to go team!!! Marketing = When the Marketing team cannot get a hold of the CMO, because the CMO cannot keep their own calendar. You know that is a recipe for disaster. One updated product sheet from March to December is not productivity. At least you changed the color and the logo. When good productive employees are let go, to keep those who play the brown nose game, that does not boost morale for others still employed. It questions decision making from the top and it does not boost confidence moving forward.

avatar
Steelwedge Software Response
10y
We appreciate your feedback and encourage you to voice any concerns or constructive feedback to your manager or Human Resources via the Company's open door policy.”
1.0
Mar 25, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good medical and dental benefits Some passionate people -- grab ahold of them because they won't last!

Cons

* Waste of talent The company's rather unique idea of getting the best deal out of new hires is to capitalize on the initial honeymoon period when they're giving 150% of effort. Once you are settled in, buh-bye! The cycle then repeats for the next batch of hires -- unless you're being grossly underpaid where it's still a great deal for them to retain you, in which case you should leave on your own anyway to get a 40% pay raise at, like, any other place. * Lack of support to those on the front line The high churn-rate means very few people have holistic or in-depth knowledge of the product. We're either dealing with new people who aren't familiar with the system, or veterans who don't get to survive till this day by being, well, entirely open and forthcoming. Either way we get fed BS. This makes the lives of those of us who directly interact with customers extremely difficult, as it's virtually impossible to get a straight answer of anything when we're being helplessly grilled by the customers. * Waste of VC fundings Let's rent and furnish a new office in a tech hub, hire some people, then fire all of them in a couple of months and shut down the office, with zero productive outcome to show for! Those poor people moved with their family and kids and were quickly out of a job. Go on, spin it and rationalize it for me on how all of the workers were "non-performant" or "won't adapt to new ways of doing things". Hello, it was a new office which you just opened. Who hired them in the first place if they sucked so badly? And after a few months you thought the whole thing was a bad idea? Superb foresight and planning! To the VCs who poured money into this sinkhole, I hope you're feeling good about how your money is being spent. At least you got to party at five-star hotels in SF with them. Oh, you weren't invited? * Head-in-sand attitude towards problems I'm actually glad they're posting those fake five star reviews laced with corporate doublespeak. They are the perfect proof of how problems are dealt with at this company: pretend everything is fine, label independent thinkers as "poor fits", fake everything publicly to cover up all the crap underneath. Don't kid youself with the so-called "open door policy" -- you'd just publicly make yourself a target of an expedited exit. They want rubber-stampers, yes-men, death march followers, not leaders or critical thinkers who have standards. People ain't dumb, we know your schtick. See the surge of people sneaking into meeting rooms or outside the building to take private phone calls? Hint: they aren't talking to their beloved sickly grandmother. The ship is sinking fast and we are looking to get off. May God have mercy on the sucker who even entertains the preposterous notion of acquiring this hopeless company.

avatar
Steelwedge Software Response
10y
Thank you for your input.
Viewing 1 - 3 of 117 Reviews

Glassdoor has 119 Steelwedge Software reviews submitted anonymously by Steelwedge Software employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Steelwedge Software is right for you.