Sutherland reviews

3.5

58% would recommend to a friend

(11,282 total reviews)
avatar

Dilip R. Vellodi

70% approve of CEO

57% positive business outlook

Sutherland has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 11,282 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Sutherland employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Human Resources & Staffing industry (3.8 stars).

Reviews by job title

11K reviews
1.0
Apr 21, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The other consultants like myself, were very nice and I made some really good friends. We backed each other up. Opportunity to obtain licenses in all 50 states, and gain knowledge of property and casualty nuances per state.

Cons

Sweat-Shop work environment and managers that did not know product. Would ask question and get different answers on how to proceed (would call MetLife and they would say one thing and Sutherland would say another) Most of the time you didn't get the correct answer to your question. It made you never know what to do. There is no focus on the quality of work produced, only on number of sales. It was "sell those policies" "sell" "sell" "sell". Office morale is very low because of all of this. New hires are getting paid more than original hires in my opinion because that will keep people there longer and they will put up with more of this badgering environment. Majority of agents are on performance improvement plans, with the threat of termination every month. Forget getting a decent bonus - that won't happen because of what they call quality scores. Quality scores are rediculous. If you don't say something in the script you get points off; if you are silent too long, if you sneeze on the phone, if you do anything that can be picked on, your bonus is chopped away till there is none. I remember a managers saying they would give people a 10% raise to work on Sundays and said "Well, you were complaining that you wanted to make more money." I was thinking, "Yeah, we were talking about our rightful bonus for selling certain amounts of insurance." You could sell $70,000 in one month, but if your quality score wasn't good (according to them), your bonus was cut until you didn't get one. I have seen 2 people do quality checks and come up with totally different scores. How can that be used for a determination in something important as commission pay. If you sell insurance, you should be able to make decent commissions for your sales. No one can work like that. If there is bad weather (snow like this year), if you don't come in you get a point for not coming in (up to 6 points, you're terminated). I saw it take one person over 2 hours to get home in a snowstorm because they did not want to "get a point". Points are used to control and ways to threaten. "Well, if you do that, you'll get a point and you won't be eligible for any personal time off that is built up." I guess they figure it will keep people in line. You are constantly threatened with having to pay the company back for your licensing in all states ($6,200) if you leave in the first year. We started out with about 70 people and that dwindled down to about 30-40 in just over a month. People just started walking out literally. I really can't blame them; you can only put up with this for so long. Now it is mass training to get the number of consultants back up so they can make their numbers. Management is puzzled as to why the rate of attrition is so high. How could they not know with people just walking out and not coming back? That to me would mean people are not happy at all and changes needed to be made somewhere.

2.0
Feb 2, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-The benefits they provide are actually pretty good. -The program I worked on actually provided good training. -I was able to get invaluable experience with customer service. -Adequate PTO available after a couple years. -Some managers were competent.

Cons

-There was no quality consistency between other sites working so you would end up having to fix their mistakes. -Wages are low in regards to the work you do. However you may receive a paltry commission. -Clients can be slave drivers. The clients also had their own call centers doing the same job as us. There were times they would close down their call centers on a busy day so they can have a company picnic while we had to pick up their slack. -Senior management kowtows to the clients like gods and would avoid advocating our concerns to the client. -You may apply to take normal customer service calls because you don't want to do sales, however if the client asks for it Sutherland will force you to do sales training and take sales calls. There is no way to get out of it even if you're uncomfortable with doing so. -You are given expectations of what to expect and then the client still does whatever they want regardless of set expectations. -Increased training and responsibilities does not translate into a greater pay. -Computer towers, monitors, and peripherals are constantly taken and moved to different work stations by people. Even though it's against company policy and can be considered an infosec violation, manager won't do anything about it. -Computers are outdated and are in constant need of repair. They still have the old ball mice which I had assumed went extinct. -The work environment in general is disgusting. There are large months old food particles everywhere. It's not uncommon to see BBQ sauce, grease, you name it spread everywhere because your fellow employees cannot respect their surroundings or other people. There was an OSHA notice in the hallway regarding bedbugs found on premises. Their outsourced cleaning crew takes poor care of the bathrooms, paper towel and soap dispensers are often neglected. This can go on. -HR is spineless -It takes an act of God to get an internal transfer, unless the program needs to get rid of people. -You work when the client wants you to work, no exceptions. -You need a day off? First they need to see if there is an opening, if not too bad so sad. If the company is going into a busy season, well it sucks to be you. -If you are good at your job and know what you're doing you can stay right where you are. If you're mediocre or popular you can become a manager. -Oh did I mention moving up does not mean wages go up? -You can only get benefits or PTO after 6 months. -The chairs are at least 10 years old, grimy, and broken. It's so bad that chairs are being taken from the break room and cafeteria.

3.0
Sep 14, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work from home is a nice option

Cons

Global Flexible Vacation time is solely up to your manager. Employees cannot schedule more than 56 days in advance which makes scheduling any type of vacation almost impossible. Global vacation policy is not a good policy and management would rather decline vacations or get irrated with you if you request to take vacation hours. The 56 day rule is because their turnover is high and they don't know what their staffing will be from month to month. They need to return to the earned PPO hours so people can work for and use their vacation time as earned and actually schedule a vacation. Right now it is being denied regularly. Excuses are made that they are not staffed well enough or it is too busy of a time of year. Staffing should not be an employee issue. Wages are also quite low for the industry type.

Viewing 70 - 72 of 11,282 Reviews

Glassdoor has 12,118 Sutherland reviews submitted anonymously by Sutherland employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Sutherland is right for you.