employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Is this your company?

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission reviews

3.7

56% would recommend to a friend

(183 total reviews)
avatar

Stephen G. Burns

20% approve of CEO

38% positive business outlook

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 183 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Government & Public Administration industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

183 reviews
4.0
Jul 8, 2014

Resident Inspector

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good pay with a 40 hour work week. There's some amount of stress in my job, but that's because I'm an above average employee and volunteer as things that come up. Most folks who work at the NRC have zero stress and enjoy a solid middle class salary with no fear of being laid off. Obviously, no one is getting rich working for the government (unless you're an independent contractor), but the pay isn't bad and at least the government isn't going to kick you to the street when the economy sours.

Cons

Management varies widely depending on which office you work in. Region II (Altanta, GA) is highly political, but other regions seem better. Management in Region II does not want to do their job and fire bad apples as this requires higher levels of approval and thus makes them look bad for hiring the person in the first place. Being a federal agency, they are required to give veterans preference for internal job postings. This means that 90-95% of upper management is ex-navy. Basically, if you are not ex-military and want to succeed and get promoted, there is little chance of becoming a division manager or higher. There are some female division level managers without navy experience, but this is needed to offset the mostly male ex-navy managers. It is possible to become a branch chief (in charge of 10-15 people), but it will take years longer versus being ex-navy. If you aren't ex-navy and want to move up as much as possible, it is very true what the other folks say about needing an engineering degree. I think there's a definite bias toward promoting engineers, as there should be since the work can be technical. There's no escaping the importance of being able to understand technical issues, as this is crucial in being a good regulator. There is truly no upside in working for the government once you've been there a few years and reach full performance grade. Sometimes I wish I'd have stayed in the private sector, but I would have been laid off in the last downturn. However, there I'd have to prove myself without being a veteran, and have the full potential to move up according to my work output, people/networking skills and intelligence. Lastly, the biggest drawback to federal employment is our dysfunctional elected government officials who are ultimately in-charge. It seems now days we are nothing but pawns to them. Value wise, it is easy to see my salary gives me less purchasing power than I had 6 years ago, but it seems our government will not give cost of living increases.

3.0
Aug 2, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pretty good work/life balance, decent pay and benefits

Cons

Senior management fails to recognize the recruiting potential of offering more telework. We fairly recently got a new head of HR who has taken us back roughly 10-15 years in telework policy. Many people have left for places that offer full time telework, as the agency practically refuses to offer it, except for arbitrarily chosen employees

2.0
May 13, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work life balance. Typical government laziness so it’s easy to cruise as much as desired. Good benefits.

Cons

The training program from new hires is antiquated and out dated at best. What was sold to me as a rigorous training program with high expectations to become a nuclear reactor inspector turned into a total blow off a self-paced study program. There are few deliverables for new employees, so it is hard to gauge success early on and how to become a polished inspector. Training consisted of shadowing inspectors in the field, which was often a hit or miss, and sometimes a total waste of time. Some inspectors are weeks away from retiring, and could care less if you fully understand all the aspects of the inspection program, but don’t worry, it still fully counts as your training experience and you’ll be held to it.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 183 Reviews

Glassdoor has 217 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission reviews submitted anonymously by US Nuclear Regulatory Commission employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if US Nuclear Regulatory Commission is right for you.