Allied Telesis reviews

3.0

52% would recommend to a friend

(161 total reviews)
avatar

Dr. Sachie Oshima

100% approve of CEO

22% positive business outlook

Allied Telesis has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 161 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Allied Telesis employee rating is 22% below average for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

161 reviews
2.0
Jun 4, 2015

wouldn't recommend

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice co-workers, free breakfast on Fridays. That's it.

Cons

Depending on what you are looking for in the company. Some people like it here. But here the cons: -Very "unstructured" organization. Other managers or senior managers can rule over and give you more work, and the worst part is nobody care about that. You have to stand up for yourself. -The management let people leave the company and don't replace them. Making the work even harder for existing employees. -If you want to stay working here, just go with the motion: hard work forever without appreciation -No performance review. -Very low compensation, even though they say there would be raise in the future. Overall, I wouldn't recommend this company.

1.0
Apr 16, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you are mediocre, lazy, and want to use zero brain cells for 8 hours a day, this company is for you. Have opinions or ideas, a desire to succeed, or want to be part of a successful company that is going places? This is NOT the company for you. So long as you cow tow to the CEO, who makes every decision, no matter how minute, you could possibly be allowed to exist and collect your mediocre paycheck, which will be more than you deserve for subsisting at this organization beyond the point you realize what a cesspool it is. If you work there now, wake up because the game will be up soon when AT North America (which is nothing more than a playground for the aged CEO to tuck losses and expenses into) will no longer be propped up by the Japanese parent. If management of AT is trying to recruit you with dazzling promises of transformation, investment and the part you will play in a "key role", smile and ask to interview the BOD (stuffed with the CEOs family and friends who equally but silently scratch their heads as to why the parent company continues to let the CEO persist), the department heads ("boomerangs" who have been tossed away over the years and have come groveling back) and three random employees who will give you the straight dope on what it's like to subsist there (take their input with a grain of salt, though-- many have succumbed to zombie-ness or have fallen victim to Stockholm Syndrome).

Cons

Management takes no action or decisions that would lead you to believe they are interested in managing a going concern. The CEO and his head henchman (who goes by the titles "President" and "Chief Risk Officer", as it suits him) run the business like a chess board full of only pawns. No company strategy, no goals or objectives, no communication--neither at the executive level nor to the rank and file. There is zero plan as to how the company will develop products or solutions that will enable them to compete in a mature, saturated networking market where key competitors have SDN strategies and solutions which are already eclipsing AT's ability to sell beyond cheap boxes. And that market is shrinking. Employees are to be kept in the dark and work their widget on the assembly line. The only perceivable business strategy being executed is the CEO and "Risk Officer" flying around with (and donating to) politicians, believing they'll get big pork barrel contracts or high level company introductions. Not a winning strategy, even if they had products people wanted to buy and the only ones customers are really buying are the ones that AT OEMs.

1.0
Oct 31, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Brand reputation for reliability and good price. Loyal customer base which keeps the company afloat. Financially stable thanks to Japan market. Note: this is a Japanese company, founded and run by an industry veteran. However the remainder of this review will focus on North America (NA) business which is owned by the Japanese holdings Co but managed independantly (at least until recently). There is opportunity here. Someone looking to try something new, perhaps reinvent themselves, and has the fortitude to handle the lack of structure, ok with poor comp plan and no perf reviews.

Cons

Dysfunctional Executive team. Widespread poor morale, lack of communication. Lots of undermining and backbiting in semi- hostile environment. Unable to develop any long term strategic plan. Sales are in deep decline and top performers have all exited. IT dept awol, with heads in the sand and no business partnership. Whats left are industry dinosaurs lacking motivation or innovative ideas. There are some college grad newbies and people looking to enhance resumes, but no loyalty ready to jump ship. The founder has taken a more active role in day to day operations in the last year to try and improve things but he is an engineer by trade, NOT a business manager. The result is constant re-organizations, operational vacuums, lack of cogent business plan, and fear / chaos rules the day.

Viewing 10 - 12 of 161 Reviews

Glassdoor has 174 Allied Telesis reviews submitted anonymously by Allied Telesis employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Allied Telesis is right for you.