employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Arup Laboratories

Is this your company?

Arup Laboratories reviews

2.4

26% would recommend to a friend

(278 total reviews)

Andy Theurer, BS, CPA

6% approve of CEO

26% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

278 reviews

Reviews about "Compensation"

Return to all reviews
1.0
Jul 16, 2026

Leadership Is Driving Talent Away

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Dedicated coworkers who do their best despite increasingly difficult conditions.

Cons

The return-to-office policy is a prime example of leadership being out of touch with today's workforce. Rather than embracing flexibility that has become standard across much of the industry, management has doubled down on an outdated approach that appears to be driving employees away rather than encouraging engagement. Attrition has become a serious problem. Experienced employees continue to leave, taking years of institutional knowledge with them. The organization does not appear capable of replacing talent at a pace that keeps up with departures, leaving teams understaffed and forcing remaining employees to absorb additional responsibilities. Instead of contemplating ways to fix this problem, HR is trying to conceptualize an incentive to get employees to leave positive glass door reviews to aid in recruitment. (So keep an eye out for a flood of positive reviews, they may be up to something) Employee morale is among the lowest I have seen. There is a widespread feeling that leadership, particularly the CEO, is more focused on enforcing policies than understanding the impact those decisions have on employees. Employee well-being often feels like an afterthought. Compensation for technical professionals is significantly below market rates (about 30% for my particular area of expertise). The expectation seems to be that employees will accept below-market salaries while taking on increasing workloads. This may have worked in the past when the company culture and benefits were above average, but it doesn't work anymore. Annual raises are insufficient and do not keep pace with inflation or the rising cost of living. Employees effectively experience a decrease in purchasing power year after year. Benefits are no longer competitive. What may have once distinguished the company from other employers in the biotech and laboratory industry has largely disappeared as competitors have improved their offerings and ARUP's have deteriorated Staffing shortages, low compensation, and rigid workplace policies create a cycle that makes retention increasingly difficult. TLDR: Overall This company appears to be losing valuable employees because of decisions that prioritize control and cost savings over retention, flexibility, and employee satisfaction. The loss of institutional knowledge is becoming increasingly visible, while compensation and benefits fail to provide a compelling reason to stay. Unless leadership changes course, I believe recruitment and retention challenges will continue to worsen.

2.0
Jul 14, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The work supports patient care and can be meaningful. When I started, I believed ARUP was a company where I could build a stable, long-term career. There are also many different types of laboratory and support positions within the organization.

Cons

My recent experience was a far cry from the company I joined in 2022. Training and regular productive work were blended together, making it difficult to learn while also keeping up with a demanding workload. I was required to remain on an extended early-morning training schedule, even after explaining that later hours would better support my ability to function and perform consistently. My requests for later hours were denied. I was later told that I was behind compared with my peers. After mistakes occurred under the pressure of the heavy workload, I raised concerns about how the work was structured and was told that this was simply how the lab was run. Rather than receiving a realistic training plan, adjusted schedule, or meaningful support, I was eventually told to find a lateral position or face termination. The internal transfer and accommodation process has also been stressful and poorly communicated. Requests for information about lower-stimulus work environments were not fully addressed, and communication between HR and the third-party leave administrator has been unclear. I have repeatedly had to follow up to determine who was responsible for forms, what documentation was outstanding, and what options were actually available. Employees who are struggling should receive clear expectations, useful feedback, and a reasonable opportunity to improve. They should not be compared with peers without consideration of whether the training structure, schedule, workload, or disability-related needs are affecting performance.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 278 Reviews

Glassdoor has 794 Arup Laboratories reviews submitted anonymously by Arup Laboratories employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Arup Laboratories is right for you.