employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Carbon Black

Part of VMware

Is this your company?

Carbon Black reviews

4.1

75% would recommend to a friend

(196 total reviews)
avatar

Patrick Morley

88% approve of CEO

45% positive business outlook

Carbon Black has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 196 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Carbon Black employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

196 reviews
1.0
Jan 29, 2017

Downhill fast

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There aren't many pros left at this point, the product is still good, but the culture has been declining for months, and there is no sense of urgency to turn it around.

Cons

-'unlimited PTO' is code for 'no PTO' -lower wages compared to other companies in the area -inconsistent/poor management -limited career growth potential

avatar
Carbon Black Response
9y
Thank you for your review. We believe HR and your management team could address your concerns if you share this experience with them. With fast growth, there are always a few bumps along the way but we assure you that our teams are consistently evaluating our benefits, perks, and cultural events and are finding ways to improve. Employee surveys have given us a good sense of what our teams value and we hope to continue to make Carbon Black an enjoyable place to work for everyone.
1.0
Mar 2, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some great individual contributors and opportunities to work remotely.

Cons

The title says it all. Huge hiring push in 2018 and then a recent ‘right-sizing’ among other disruptive staffing changes along the way. Lack of diversity at the upper levels of management including the C suite. Promotions are based on who you know not your merit or experience.

3.0
Jul 29, 2020

New engineering management making the same mistakes as previous ones

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Coworkers are willing to chip in and help and care about the product. The company succeeds despite managements flaws because of hard working and conscientious employees. Even with all these problems the division and products have a path to success. Products are interesting and challenging. Work from home and flexible schedule.

Cons

Management is a constant Peter Principle Ferris wheel of over promotions. Competent middle managers are continually promoted or given additional responsibility until they fail and get laid off or quit. Former CB managers and engineers thrive in the same or higher positions in other companies after leaving. Management has a cognitive distortion of every six months saying they will fix technical debt and quality issues and they mean it this time, but budgets and resources always favor feature velocity. This left both technical debt (deferred and more robust redesigns, infrastructure, documentation, invitation, customer communication, tools, quality, stability, expandability, and technical expertise), and organizational debt (process, moral, training, coordination, institutional knowledge, and intra-team communication). Once the first slipped feature date is announced they relapse back into feature velocity first mode. The next release is sent out, customer complain about it and metrics look bad, management gets replaced or reassigned and there is a focus on quality for a couple of months and the process repeats itself. Any employees with strengths that didn’t prioritize results driven feature velocity have been laid off, quit, or just keep quiet and work on features. Most visionaries, teachers, coaches, coordinators, connectors, and strategists have long left the company as their strengths were not used and often disparaged. Engineers and Product Owners who prioritized feature velocity over all else are quickly put into management to reinforce feature velocity. External management hires quickly learn feature velocity is job one or are quickly shown the door. Little resources are spent on jumps in invitation and must be gained through acquisition. The company operates under a hero management style, only concerned about today’s visible crisis and ignoring larger underlying problems. Most of the upper management that caused these problems cashed out and left after the buyout, but their philosophy remains. All VMWare has done is rebranded the same philosophy of features first with limited understanding of resources. Then only adding resources for the most visible issues when upper management thinks it’s a crisis. Often prioritizing issues based on office politics over engineering or business priorities, while ignoring larger systemic problems until they eventual become a crisis. Unless you thrive in chaos, love coding quick solutions, and are a results driven developer I would avoid working here for a year as they sort out the buyout and VMware really understands what they bought and hopefully creates realistic work levels and additional investment in engineering. Real career advancement is limited. You are overloaded with work, so any additional learning or advancement must be done on the employees’ time. Any sign of competency is rewarded with a vastly increased workload. Larger solutions are not prioritized unless you implement it yourself on your own time or in response to a crisis. Many times, ideas, tools or solutions have been proposed for years internally and ignored, only after external requests or a crisis happens will they be implemented.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 196 Reviews

Glassdoor has 216 Carbon Black reviews submitted anonymously by Carbon Black employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Carbon Black is right for you.