Exponent reviews

3.0

34% would recommend to a friend

(360 total reviews)
avatar

Catherine Corrigan

30% approve of CEO

30% positive business outlook

Exponent has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 360 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Exponent employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management & Consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

360 reviews
2.0
Sep 12, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The Construction Consulting practice has a diverse office, with a refreshingly large number of women in management positions. There is ample access to industry experts with opportunities for informal mentoring (Exponent's mentoring program only accepts employees with 2 years at the company). Depending on the contracts assigned, work schedules are fairly flexible, though this not always the case for entry-level employees. Working from home is acceptable, when approved beforehand. Good project experience for recent graduates, although the day-to-day tasks are dull and repetitive. Paid overtime, however management treats this as a "bonus", which it is not.

Cons

Since the company is publicly traded, management is primarily concerned with revenue, and treats all other aspects of business as extraneous. Junior employees are commanded to achieve unreasonably high billable hours / total hours (utilization), to the detriment of 'overhead' activities. These include professional (licenses/certifications, industry groups/society meetings and conferences, publications) and people development (mentoring/training, team building, career planning). These activities are expected to be addressed off of the clock, with minimal impact to the employee's utilization. This results in entry level employees being "nose to the grindstone" at all times, with little time to give to business development, recruiting, research opportunities, or even work with other practices. Meanwhile, senior management is allowed to have low utilization because of business development efforts, but since the organization is so top heavy, this affects the profit margin of the practice adversely, and directors admonish us to get utilization back up. Overtime is required at the Associate and Senior Associate level; lower level employees always work on multiple projects, but are also expected to support any random request that a manager sends along. This is not well communicated at the outset, but becomes integral to promotion and is used as the basis for raises and bonuses. The promotion cycle is strictly once a year, and is not a 360 review. Management does round tables to discuss lower level employees, and awards raises and bonuses based on the cumulative opinion of the worker. This a very subjective process that allows personal perception to outweigh technical performance. As long as utilization is high and the employee is seen by most managers as a team player, hard worker, and client pleaser, a small reward is given. Raises are not generous (1-3%), and bonuses are based off of revenue (~10% of base salary if you get one). Junior employees rarely get projects assigned to them, so little revenue is attributed to them, so bonuses are usually modest, too. Base compensation is not considered competitive by most employees in the practice, including managers. Negotiate salary before accepting; if your number is outside of their range for a position, they may offer you a higher level position if you have the requisite experience. The practice has very high turnover (12 people in 2 years). Reasons given that pertain to the company: dislike of the major client, little room for advancement, unsatisfactory management style, and dislike of daily duties. The Construction Consulting practice has an unhealthy work environment for junior employees, as they are treated as chattel to be traded among projects as needed. Due to the high turnover, these transitions occur frequently, and are usually too quick and not well communicated to the client. Associates are expected to onboard new hires and train new employees while continuing to manage their usual tasks, while also participating in recruiting efforts and addressing ad hoc requests. There is little respect given to schedule or current commitments. Feedback, when given directly rather than passed down the chain to a supervisor, is laced with inappropriate observations about personality and character disguised as career advice. Upper management is extremely absent, and fosters no relationship with lower level employees. Management laments the high turnover and low morale, but takes no action to improve the work environment or give space for employee feedback.

2.0
Sep 7, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- breadth of technical problems one is exposed to, at the "associate" through "senior engineer" level. - camaraderie of the staff. - management support to try new ideas, especially wrt business development.

Cons

- business development rules the day. Technical excellence is very secondary (pretty much taken for granted). With most projects spanning a period of one to two years, there's only so much technical depth that can be required anyway. - there's only one career path: associate-engineer-manager-principal. The key to growth is to find new clients. That's it. It was always a bit paradoxical to me why they shopped for new Ph.D. recruits at Stanford-MIT-Caltech, when the skill sets honed at those places really aren't needed at Exponent, and in fact the brainy-introvert type that goes there doesn't typically do particularly well at selling, or "ambulance-chasing" (get used to that ugly expression). Simple MBA's or marketing types (from anywhere), with an engineering BS/MS makes a lot more sense imho. - be prepared for soul crushing hours. Family-compromising situations, with lots of very last minute schedule changes that require you to stay there. Example:I recall receiving a call at 5pm on a quiet Friday, when nothing happened all day, and ended up having to spend an all-nighter at the office, and most of the weekend, despite having out-of-town guests at home. To be fair, Exponent tries to reward this (financially) the best they can (overtime pay at the lower levels; yearly bonuses beyond that), and I received a promotion partly based on my performance on that one project. But don't expect to get the next week off just because you worked 40 hours in three days. Saying 'no' just because you told your daughter you were going camping at the beach that weekend pretty much spells career death. To put it all in perspective, ten years later: that promotion/bonus didn't get me that far, and I still cringe at the thought that I blew off my family... - Company is arguably built as a 'pyramid scheme'. An entry-level associate will have a 'multiplier' (defined as your hourly billing rate to the client, divided by your hourly salary) of about 4-4.5. So if you make $50/hr the client gets billed $200/hr, or so. A principal will be at around 1.5-2.5. The remaining 3-hours hourly salary rate of the entry-level engineer go to 'pay for the lights' - or so they say. But someone has to subsidize the top echelon's hefty bonuses. You get the picture. - As with every company, it gets more and more financially rewarding as you go up (principal-level required), but it's exponential here in many ways (maybe where the name comes from? :) It becomes easier to attract and nurture new clients (e.g., if you're an office director, even in a small office, all new client calls go straight to you, no matter how the prospective client got the office number, so 'marketing' pretty much takes care of itself). Again, this is essential in this business. If you don't have your own portfolio of clients (soooo hard to establish, especially at the beginning when your multiplier is so high, that many never get anywhere with that.), you will feel that you serve at the pleasure of your immediate manager, who provides those clients and projects to you. There's no job security, no matter how long you've been there. If you cross him/her, watch out. I've seen heads roll from excellent technical engineers, who had been there for more than 5 years, for the stupidest of reasons. Conversely, I've seen dubiously competent ones, but with good marketing skills and a continuous stream of clients, get away with murder... And they're still there. Project this far into the future and who do you think will surround you? - lab and research facilities are only so-so. Nothing like a good university lab. Phoenix has the most extensive ones; others pretty much buy as they go, or rent others facilities. - making matters worse for the new entry-level folks managing their first few projects, some VPs have a habit of tacking a 'tax' on projects they brought in to their own practice. [The Materials and Corrosion Group VP's name is even sometime used to identify the tax!] Basically, adding a few hours here and there, with little to no value added to the project, so that their 'utilization' (fraction of hours worked, based on a 40 hour week, when they are 'billable', or billing to a project) looks good at the end of the year. [Get used to this word also, utilization, or 'UT' for short. UT is an essential metric at Exponent, at all levels. You'll be expected to maintain an average annual UT of 80%, or 32 hours a week of billable work. No, this is not possible while working only 40 hours consistently. Vacations/holidays get factored in as 0% UT, of course, and bring the average down.] So, putting aside the obvious ethical questions this brings up, it makes your projects that much more difficult to manage: you have to talk to the client at the end of the month and explain why he/she is getting billed $40k for that analysis! Enjoy.

Viewing 277 - 279 of 360 Reviews

Glassdoor has 400 Exponent reviews submitted anonymously by Exponent employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Exponent is right for you.