Mott MacDonald reviews

3.9

78% would recommend to a friend

(3,219 total reviews)
avatar

James Harris

89% approve of CEO

63% positive business outlook

Mott MacDonald has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 3,219 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Mott MacDonald employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Construction, Repair & Maintenance Services industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
1.0
May 23, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company has a reasonable name in industry but that has been changing for the worse.

Cons

Stuff must use annual leave if they have no fee earning work (after that, it’s unpaid leave), almost no investment in staff (if it costs company), huge turnover of staff, low pay / really low bonus / poor pension contributions, lowest annual leave in industry (20 days), massively heavy with senior management who hugely stifle promotion prospects of less experienced staff (meaning company has a big dearth of talent between 7-15 years experience), company likes to publicise that its employee owned but the truth is that only about 15% of staff have shares (for all other employees it’s just like any PLC competitor). No new ideas at company, as senior staff have mostly all been there 15-30 years. Pay cuts were put in place for Covid-19 reasons but saving have still not been used or returned to current or former employees.

3.0
Apr 4, 2023

Mixed feelings

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

All of the below (pros and cons) vary massively depending on your team and role. These reflect my experience only, on a specialist environmental team. -Good work-life balance -Interesting projects -Some opportunity for international travel -some support on technical excellence passion projects -Many extremenly knowledgable and skilled experts in certain fields -International reach, and huge variety of sectors covered

Cons

-Relatively poor pay by industry standards -Poor progression, and progression seems to depend entirely on your relationship with your team leader / line manager. You can be an outstanding technical expert or project manager, but if you aren't their friend, it seems like you'll go nowhere. -Poor communication between teams -Lack of time codes for mandatory activities, like divisional meetings -A lot of red tape when attempting to win work -Huge variations in quality of life between teams/units/divisions- some are very flexible, and respect your personal life, others expect regular unpaid overtime and deny leave -Though on paper the company is employee owned, share ownership is extremely opaque, and only available to quite senior staff. Non-shareholders are very much kept in the dark. As far as I know, no junior staff own shares. -Strong push to "get back into the office" even though many staff have been home-working even before the pandemic. Push to return to office has not been justified with anything except vague platitudes about culture. -Fairly poor employee retention, linked to issues raised above

1.0
Oct 12, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good team and growth if you pick the right office (Southampton)

Cons

I don't even know where to begin. They hired 3 graduates at a time when the entire department consisted of around 20 people which is a substantial workforce increase. Considering the fact they barely had any new work incoming and I wasn't in the 'main' acoustics office, instead based in Croydon, meant I was left without any work. I was in a never-ending loop asking for work and then being pied off by management as there was "nothing to do". On the very rare occasion there was work to do, I was given a word document to spell-check. Yep, fresh off a 4 year specialised acoustics degree and I was being given word documents to format, that should be the admin part of a wider technical task. I can recall probably 6 spell-check/formatting jobs I completed, so that equated to roughly 1 task given every month, which would take 2-hours max if you dragged it out. This leads me on to the timecode system. Every single minute of your day needs to be allocated to a chargeable project. If you have a drink, a chat or do some basic admin, well tough luck you need to charge that to a project. In my situation this became a big issue, as I had no work to do and therefore nothing to charge. If you don't charge to a project, you don't get paid. I was told in round about ways by management to charge my time to HS2 even when I was not completing any work related to HS2 (only ever in calls, never in emails or messages). I was essentially told to lie about the work I was doing on a public infrastructure project funded by taxpayer money. I couldn't speak up about this at the time as the meagre 29k salary they pay barely covers living in London, so I could not risk a disciplinary or dismissal during my probation period with little to no savings. Further to that, I could not blame management as I had no evidence and they would have wiped their hands of me in an instant. I've never been treated with such disdain before and I was kicking myself that I took this job over the other offers I had, until I thankfully managed to move to a much better company. If you have the choice, do not work for this team, you will not gain or learn anything.

Viewing 343 - 345 of 3,219 Reviews

Glassdoor has 3,587 Mott MacDonald reviews submitted anonymously by Mott MacDonald employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Mott MacDonald is right for you.