OpenText reviews

3.2

52% would recommend to a friend

(5,613 total reviews)
avatar

Ayman Antoun

34% approve of CEO

43% positive business outlook

OpenText has an employee rating of 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 5,613 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The OpenText employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

6K reviews
1.0
Nov 3, 2014

Just horrible...

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Competitive salary - Good benefits - Some very nice people

Cons

- Management that smiles as they slowly push a knife in your back - Lack of transparency with management - No room to grow internally - Lack of integration with acquired technologies / 5 product pillars - Little work/life balance

1.0
Apr 25, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Sorry I cannot think of any.

Cons

Terrible leadership, zero focus on product innovation or integrating all the legacy products in the stack via acquisition, and the EIM thing is not a vision but a pipe dream that is totally divorced from the reality of the company's product portfolio. Halfway through this fiscal year, over 2/3 of the sales reps had sold less than $100K in total revenue and less than 10 reps were on pace to make quota. Yet somehow, the company keeps reporting earnings growth. Virtually every rep in the entire company is currently interviewing elsewhere.

2.0
Oct 9, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The atmosphere was filled with friendly, supportive, and talented individuals who made each day enjoyable. The "team life" was awesome!

Cons

One of the major drawbacks was the company's approach to politics. The CEO/CTO often emphasized and promoted what could be described as "woke" agendas in company-wide meetings. Guest included activist after activist. These meetings, which invited all 13,000+ employees, sometimes felt like platforms for promoting specific political viewpoints rather than focusing on the company's mission and goals. This heavy emphasis on politics within the workplace created an environment that was distracting and sometimes uncomfortable. Additionally, there were concerns about the company's approach to diversity and inclusion. It was openly stated in all-hands meetings that a specific percentage of managerial roles would be reserved for women of color. While diversity and inclusion are important, it felt as though these objectives were prioritized over talent and skills. This approach raised concerns about whether promotions and advancement were based on merit. Furthermore, there was a sense among employees that they were treated more like numbers than individuals. The company's growth strategy heavily relied on acquiring other companies, which often led to a loss of the small, close-knit feeling that many employees initially enjoyed. The sense of being part of something smaller and more personal was gradually eroded as the company expanded through acquisitions. Lastly, there was a noticeable disparity between the company's financial success, as often touted in all-hands meetings, and the actual compensation and advancement opportunities for employees. Pay scales were notably low, and promises of promotions and advancement were frequently unfulfilled due to claims of budget constraints, despite the company's consistent claims of achieving record-breaking quarter.

Viewing 88 - 90 of 5,613 Reviews

Glassdoor has 6,405 OpenText reviews submitted anonymously by OpenText employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if OpenText is right for you.