employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Partners in Health

Is this your company?

Partners in Health reviews

4.1

73% would recommend to a friend

(245 total reviews)

Gary Gottlieb and Sheila Davis

87% approve of CEO

63% positive business outlook

Partners in Health has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 245 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Partners in Health employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Nonprofit & NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

245 reviews
2.0
Jan 9, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

People who work at PIH, especially those who aren't in the executive team, are a pleasure to work with because they are committed to the mission and have interesting experiences. The PIH approach to health care delivery is right on and an excellent thing to learn about and practice if you're interested in global health. It's still to be seen if Gary Gottlieb is the right leader for PIH at this time. My advice for junior staff is to negotiate your salary (HR is not to be trusted on equitable fair pay), advocate for greater responsibility and promotions that will benefit your long-term career, and plan on spending no more than two-three years there before moving on to something else you are excited about. Also, limit your friendships with co-workers to avoid gossip that will make you lose faith in the leadership team - and do your part not to promote gossip. Have a life outside of PIH.

Cons

Partners In Health is a toxic working environment because managers' actions so often do not align with the PIH values and mission, which is what attracts most junior staff to work there. Meanwhile, the seriousness of the mission and the culture of self-sacrifice may make you take failures personally, when it's not your fault. It's a chaotic and dysfunctional work environment, due to secrecy, cronyism, poorly thought out decisions in an unclear decision-making structure, consolidation of power in founders, executives, and people who have relationships with the founders, drastically different ideas of how PIH should operate, and rampant mistrust of executives. Turnover is extraordinarily high; most junior staff do not stay more than 2-3 years. Even people in the leadership team have been turning over (some thankfully).

1.0
Apr 29, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

When people cooperate and put aside egos, good work can be done. The local country staff in Haiti and Africa are often incredible, dedicated people, and they do a lot of great work for relatively small pay.

Cons

The organization is a shell of what it once was, and due to a lack of coordinated management is a mess. Senior leadership, both directors and managers, who were around for 7-10 years, were good at what they did and were dedicated to the causes that PIH promotes, have been either fired outright or pushed out in a passive/aggressive manner over the past 3-5 years. What is left behind are wealthy former investment firm managers and similar people who have been newly hired to serve as PIH's leadership team on development, communications, evaluation, HR and other teams. They don't really understand the work that is being done in the field, and their arrogance is off-putting to the staff in developing countries. To the Boston staff they are aloof at best and shockingly ignorant of the most basic global health knowledge at worst. There is no clear direction given to employees, and the organization operates in a very haphazard manner. As a result of constant budget cuts, threats of layoffs, overwhelming egos and infighting, the staff does not work cooperatively even though many of them are good people. The lack of structure and leadership results in confusion and a lot of animosity, and the work suffers as a result. Turnover is overwhelming and constant. During the past 3 years, several positions have turned over more than three times (that is, many people staying less than a year). It is sad, because this used to be a good place to work, even though the pay may have been low and the pace hectic, at least it stood for something. That strong sense of purpose is now overwhelmed by egotistical directors who simply do not grasp the work that needs to be done, a lack of leadership and a non-existent management structure.

1.0
Sep 23, 2021

Partners in Hell

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent work hours - I rarely had to work more than 40 hours

Cons

-Insanely low compensation; don't even bother accepting that coordinator role, please keep job searching -Toxic employees at every corner; my manager disrespected me, gaslit me, and bullied me at every opportunity she could get -HR is useless - they will do anything to protect coveted employees even if 90% of people hate them and know they are insufferable -The culture is incredible stale and unwelcoming -Every new hire is literally the same. They look the same, act the same, and sound the same. How many white women from liberal arts colleges can you hire? -There is a group of a "lifetime" PIHers who somehow always get promoted and avoid all layoffs and firings; people are rewarded for how much they suck up to upper management and celebrate their terrible, poorly researched decisions

Viewing 1 - 3 of 245 Reviews

Glassdoor has 329 Partners in Health reviews submitted anonymously by Partners in Health employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Partners in Health is right for you.