Verkada reviews

3.7

63% would recommend to a friend

(1,060 total reviews)

Filip Kaliszan

85% approve of CEO

72% positive business outlook

Verkada has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 1,060 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Verkada employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
3.0
Apr 19, 2025

Ok Place to work

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Verkada is a good place to work if you do not have software experience, or fresh out of school. You will meet good people who will become friends. My channel role provided me with a great amount of autonomy. The product is good but struggles in the private segment especially upmarket. You can build a personal brand with your partners and customers that will take you much farther than Verkada. Advice for those without software experience get in learn as much as you can then go work elsewhere. If you have software experience avoid unless you are down bad.

Cons

Quotas are way too high and ever changing. You will witness airheads paraded and promoted for hitting numbers in large US metro areas. There are no rural markets that consistently over perform. Leadership as a whole is highly questionable even more so channel leadership. There is a massive rift between sales and channel. Verkada leadership views the channel as a necessary evil not a true force multiplier. In the channel it is impossible to get promoted if you don't fit a type, sales team is more diverse. Work life balance in the channel can be a struggle. Lastly channel pay is not good.

3.0
Apr 16, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Verkada has the best physical security platform hands down, tremendous training, and almost every sales resource imaginable at your disposal.

Cons

Verkada is constantly changing their compensation package. They don't cut your base, but year after year AE's lose earning (commission) potential through restructuring roles (explained below): - Splitting Territories: Lose 1/2 of your accounts for a "new AE" to have a "new territory", or potentially 1/3 of your accounts where two established reps lose 1/3 of their account base, carving out a "new territory" for a new AE. - Re-Tiering Account List: Mid Market Sales is a majority of Verkada's salesforce. They restructured Mid Market sales creating a "new role" for the established customer & prospect base in a given territory. Transitioning Tier 1 businesses, schools and municipalities to a MM Select role, and taking the bottom two thirds of that territory and assigning it MM Territory role. Same corporate trend of doubling the reps in an existing territory. - Growth vs Strategic AE: A territory previously managed by one AE, is split with historical AE taking over current customers, and losing prospect accounts with $0 bookings to a "new" growth AE. These changes have a compounding effect on the AE's in seat, and their ability to hit OTE and accelerators. The account base and roles constantly change, but quotas stay the same. In a realistic (true) situation, an AE is given a patch of 500 accounts, down the line lose 150 accounts in a 1/3 split for a "new territory", shortly after lose their tier one accounts, going from 350 accounts to ~300. Shortly after that, the AE is no longer measured or compensated on existing customer renewals.

Viewing 205 - 207 of 1,060 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,115 Verkada reviews submitted anonymously by Verkada employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Verkada is right for you.