employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

World Wildlife Fund

Engaged Employer

World Wildlife Fund reviews

3.8

74% would recommend to a friend

(739 total reviews)
avatar

Carter S. Roberts

88% approve of CEO

63% positive business outlook

World Wildlife Fund has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 739 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The World Wildlife Fund employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Nonprofit & NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

739 reviews
1.0
Sep 29, 2022

Toxic Work Environment

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Every other Friday off, working with animal content (who doesn't love that?).

Cons

- This was my dream company to work for, but unfortunately it was a nightmare. It is impossible to succeed under a manager that doesn't know how to/doesn't want to manage (and lies to make you look bad to cover their own butt). Nothing you do will be right and you will be bullied while you work your butt off trying to figure out how to do what is wanted of you (which is never clear and changes with every minute because senior management expectations are totally different than direct management). I lost 10 pounds in the few months I worked there because I never ate due to stress. Do yourself a favor and work literally anywhere else. It's not worth the low salary. - No bonus

3.0
Sep 2, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Brand recognition to be working for one of the most effective global environmental orgs. (but WWF also knows this, so will leverage their brand to pay less to consultants and staff) - Getting to work on global issues and traveling to those places around the world - Working with truly dedicated and brilliant and strategic thought-leaders

Cons

- Utter lack of management competency. Their promotion/advancement model is based off of subject-matter mastery, so if you really know the field and the latest issues, you will advance ultimately to becoming a manager, even though you have no ability and no demonstration of any past experience to manage. Staff will suffer from professional stagnation for years under poor/lack of management. - Advancement is too dependent on managerial style. No standard advancement model for the organization, so you will see different advancement rates in different departments, regardless of similar breadths of responsibilities - Poor understanding of DEI basics - Toxic environment for people of color - Zero work-life balance. Don't be fooled by their "Panda Fridays", where you get every other Friday off. You essentially don't get paid for those Fridays, and are still expected to work and respond. Bi-weekly pay period is comprised of 70 hours. - They put on countless staff goodies, such as bringing in quarterly dessert trucks, omelette stations, and all the wondrous stuff that seem so magical. But keep in mind that staff below Mid-Level Management are severely underpaid. These distractions are just that: distractions, to make you feel that at least you get these fun activities, despite the low pay. - The US office conducted an office-wide survey to assess and potentially improve on their staff satisfaction levels. Their survey questions on DEI, in particular, were designed to draw out general perspectives of staff (i.e., "what does DEI mean to you? Is it important?), instead of actually asking "How is WWF performing in making this place as inclusive as it can be? Do you feel heard?"). The whole internal assessment/initiative was flawed and was really not designed well to actually help WWF improve on the areas it really needs help on. So the fact that the HR department spent significant time and energy and resources on this effort, which produced something so flawed in design from the outset is a huge red flag that the organization really doesn't understand how much it's not hearing its people. - HR is there to protect company assets, not you, the employee.

2.0
Jun 16, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some of the best reasons to work at World Wildlife Fund: - Panda Fridays (You get every other Friday off) - There are many Professional Development opportunities - There are great opportunities to collaborate across departments - Supportive colleagues

Cons

Some of the worst reasons to work at World Wildlife Fund: - If you are a diverse candidate, I will warn you that WWF is not the best environment for inclusivity or equity. I have seen an experienced, People of Color being gaslit by leadership, scared into not reporting their grievances to HR, criticized and punished for minor mistakes in comparison to their white counterparts, and voices of People of Color completely ignored when it comes to contributing to the wonderful work WWF does. During my time there 4 Women of Color left in less than one year due to the manipulation and covert racism experienced in that space.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 739 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,281 World Wildlife Fund reviews submitted anonymously by World Wildlife Fund employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if World Wildlife Fund is right for you.