Carnegie Dartlet reviews

1.9

9% would recommend to a friend

(99 total reviews)

Gary Colen

13% approve of CEO

20% positive business outlook

Carnegie Dartlet has an employee rating of 1.9 out of 5 stars, based on 99 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a poor working experience there. The Carnegie Dartlet employee rating is 49% below average for employers within the Media & Communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

99 reviews
1.0
Jan 26, 2026

Unorganized, Inefficient, and Overwhelming

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

My coworkers were supportive, kind and a pleasure to work with, which made navigating an otherwise difficult, high-pressure, and stressful job more bearable.

Cons

I joined the company feeling hopeful and excited, but that optimism quickly faded due to a lack of structure and organization, a disjointed onboarding process, an unsustainable workload, and overall inefficient practices. -Structure and Organization: The company relies heavily on tools such as Asana and Looker Studio, to the extent that when these platforms experience issues, workflows across the organization are derailed. Communication is often fragmented, with conversations easy to lose, inconsistent naming conventions, and excessive time spent determining where information should be shared rather than completing the work itself. There are also frequently too many people assigned to a single account, which creates confusion around roles and responsibilities and contributes to a “too many cooks in the kitchen” dynamic. As a result, it felt like employees were expected to be experts in every aspect of the account, and significant time was spent on calls that were not directly relevant to their work due to overlapping responsibilities across teams. The internal CRM was also extremely disorganized, difficult to navigate, outdated and inefficient, especially when compared to the many intuitive and user-friendly CRM options available. Additionally, employees, including salaried staff, were required to track time across multiple platforms. While this data may be valuable from a company perspective, the cumulative time spent on tracking felt exhausting and inefficient from an employee standpoint. -Onboarding Process: Onboarding began strong with group training that covered company fundamentals, but quickly became disjointed. Many team-specific resources were outdated, missing, or nearly impossible to locate when needed. Although much of the onboarding was self-guided, there were limited opportunities to practice or apply what was being learned. As a result, it was difficult to retain information and confidently perform tasks once they became part of the role. -Unsustainable Workload: The workload expected of employees managing multiple clients was excessive and often felt unsustainable. Employees were required to monitor an extremely high volume of conversations across multiple platforms. Basic information was frequently requested, which could have been minimized with a well-organized and user-friendly CRM. Instead, inefficient systems added unnecessary complexity and significantly increased day-to-day stress.

1.0
Sep 13, 2025

Broken culture, overpromised, underdelivered

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some of the best and brightest colleagues — though you inevitably become trauma-bonded through shared burnout. Unlimited PTO — but take “too much” (by whatever arbitrary measure HR decides) and you’ll be flagged. Educational assistance benefit — sounds great, except you’ll never have the time or mental bandwidth to actually use it.

Cons

Leadership is all talk, no walk. Promises are made at the top and recycled endlessly: “we’ll provide more transparency,” “we’ll improve communication,” “we’ll value your input.” These phrases show up in quarterly slides but never translate into reality. Carnegie pushes out endless employee surveys only to ignore feedback or spin the results with corporate jargon. Employees who voice concerns non-anonymously are gaslit, brushed off, or met with vague platitudes. Speaking up here is meaningless. Workloads are unreasonable and unsupported. Constant turnover means it’s not unusual to message a colleague on Slack only to find their account deactivated. Employees are pressured to sell and deliver products without proper project management processes in place, leading to chaos for both staff and clients. Burnout is rampant — all while pay remains below market. Meanwhile, leadership parades “record sales” and “stellar growth” while employees wonder where the money is going (hint: not to the people keeping the company afloat, but to private equity pockets). The culture is toxic and political. Leadership operates like a good ol’ boys club where success depends on who you know and how well you play internal politics, not merit. This fuels distrust, cliques, and an environment where nothing feels fair or transparent. Senior leadership rarely takes responsibility for missteps. Instead, systemic problems are blamed on “budget constraints” or “the market.” The response to challenges is often to “sunset” a team (a cold euphemism for layoffs delivered via random meeting invites) or restructure for the umpteenth time — destabilizing the workplace even further. Bottom line: Carnegie talks a big game about culture, transparency, and valuing employees. In reality, it’s all smoke and mirrors. Unless leadership learns to actually listen, own mistakes, and invest in its people, this cycle of dysfunction and burnout will never end.

avatar
Carnegie Dartlet Response
8mo
Thank you for taking the time to provide such detailed and candid feedback regarding your experience at Carnegie. We are grateful for your honest assessment, and we are committed to facing these concerns directly and seriously. We were pleased to read your positive comments about working with "some of the best and brightest colleagues", which highlight the incredible talent that we know is at the heart of Carnegie. We recognize that the core of your feedback revolves around a perceived gap between leadership's intentions and the reality of our employees. We take your points on a lack of transparency, ignored survey feedback, and management accountability to heart. HR conducts a quarterly review of PTO usage across all departments to identify patterns of usage which also include unacceptable low usage. The goal of the flexible PTO policy is to empower employees to prioritize rest and mental bandwidth, not just in policy, but in lived company culture. We recognize that culture is lived every day, not just a marketing slogan, and we are dedicated to ensuring our actions reflect the values of integrity and transparency we claim to uphold. I strongly encourage you to reach out directly to me at hr@carnegiehighered.com.
1.0
Aug 5, 2025

Unlimited PTO but at what cost..

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Unlimited PTO Remote Work Flexible

Cons

A huge issue is that salary here is way below market value. Granted we get nice benefits but is it worth being paid $35k less than my peers with the same experience and background as me? Chaos all the time and two company restructures in the past 2 years. Say they are people first but are laying off teams at a time. Sense of job stability and high company morale has dipped tremendously recently.

avatar
Carnegie Dartlet Response
11mo
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We're sorry to hear that your experience with Carnegie has been frustrating, and we appreciate your candor. We take your comments about compensation and company stability very seriously, as we know these are critical factors for our employees. We are continuously working to balance providing a competitive benefits package with market-appropriate compensation. This is an ongoing process, and we are committed to regularly reviewing our compensation structure to ensure we remain competitive within our industry. Our priority remains supporting our employees and ensuring the long-term health of the business. We are dedicated to providing transparency and stability as we move forward. Please reach out to hr@carnegiehighered.com with additional comments or concerns.
Viewing 19 - 21 of 99 Reviews

Glassdoor has 102 Carnegie Dartlet reviews submitted anonymously by Carnegie Dartlet employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Carnegie Dartlet is right for you.