employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Charlie Health

Is this your company?

Charlie Health reviews

3.5

64% would recommend to a friend

(418 total reviews)

65% positive business outlook

Charlie Health has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 418 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Charlie Health employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Healthcare industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

418 reviews
1.0
Jun 25, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

the team is the only reason I remained in the role as long as I did; the clinical outreach team is filled with brilliant and compassionate humans who are truly looking to make an impact in their communities

Cons

Unfortunately every "unsavory" review on this site is unbelievably true. It's rather easy to weed out the coerced reviews as the only ones that truly highlight the inner workings of Charlie Health are those that go into much more detail and all land 2 stars or below. While this company is only 4 years old making it a "start-up" it has grown so large so quickly it's a disservice to the employees to cloak their actions under the guise of the nature of start-ups. They do not have a clue how to sustainably manage the growth they are seeing and employees and patients alike are suffering as a result. While the company mission and values speak to an incredible goal that we can all get behind, it is not what guides leadership in their expectations of the outreach team. On many different occasions management and other outreach members make jokes of 60+ hour work weeks. During my first two weeks I had 3 different team members across the country inform me that they only work until 5pm, a practice essentially unacceptable to upper management. None of those individuals are with the company anymore. Turnover within the outreach team is skyrocketing, they are constantly firing on top of people quitting left and right because they are fed up with the toxic work place environment. VP level managers have communicated they believe "providers would still be sending Charlie Health referrals if we didn't have an outreach team in the field" making the job more grueling and unfathomable as we are working our lives away to reach their unattainable goals for salaries that are essentially a slap in the face. Regardless of your career history, clinical credentials, degrees, cost of living, industry standards, and time spent working you will not be paid accordingly. I have been in sales/marketing for years and when I first started leadership was very adamant that outreach is not a sales role WHICH IN FACT IT IS. During my interview process recruiters and managers conveniently omitted many of the KPIs that this role is goaled against, they only communicated that referrals would be the only thing I would be working on. This is very far from the truth. You will essentially become a care navigator, crisis counselor, and go to person for deeply struggling patients and families. Not only does this consume a massive amount of time but it takes a huge toll mentally and the all leadership has to say is "wow you're so dedicated to helping people in your community, you're really going above and beyond". Sadly there is little time to care for yourself in this role because it's all about meeting the numbers on their timeline, numbers that are so highly inflated and out of reach you only have to hit 50% to stay in "good standing" yet folks still struggle to meet these goals across the country. These unmentioned KPIs are the KPIs that must be met to promote or receive a pay increase so why it was so clearly disregarded during the interview process is mind boggling. Since these goals are so widely out of reach the prospect of moving up in the company is so abysmal even though recruiters and managers portrayed employees that worked hard moved up quickly due to the start-up nature of the company. Another absolutely wild structure is that goals are the same across the country, every single outreach manager has the same goals regardless of where they are located, I have never worked in another sales role or hear of another sales role where this has been the case. On top of the out of touch goals there is a ridiculous amount of micromanagement seething through leadership that ultimately creates additional mundane, unuseful work for the employees. They have required full day camera on zoom meetings just to cold call accounts, tracking which accounts you have/have not reached out to and harassing you to have calls logged on salesforce even if the account has been closed and you've asked for it to be removed from your account list. The amount of time you have to spending over explaining yourself and the decisions you are making about your territory is enough to make you go mad. If what you outline occurring within your territory does not align with the numbers of the growth strategy team you will be shut down and your thoughts generally disregarded. If you are involved in a territory change where multiple accounts that you have built relationships with and consistently refer patients are assigned to newly hired outreach members you will have to fight tooth and nail attempting to keep any of those accounts in your book, ultimately it will be very very very rare and lucky if you are able to keep one or two. It's extremely difficult to find a manager to fight for you with upper leadership and if you do have one they unfortunately will fall victim to the toxic positivity kool-aid and turn into another talking head for the VPs/Csuite. This place bleeds toxic positivity, everything "motivational" is undermined with tones and verbiage of "this still isn't good enough". It seems as though nothing is good enough or could make upper management say "good job" and just end the sentence there. When they do shout out team members it's the same handful favorites highlighted, proving to be more un-motivating than anything else. Most of the "support" and "coaching" provided is essentially reworded and regurgitated information you learn during the onboarding process. You will be asked to fill out a million different surveys on how they can improve working conditions or provide additional trainings only for them to use the responses as a very miniscule guideline to produce unhelpful, off tone trainings that become another time wasting calendar block. There are so many more details or additional points I could touch on and get in the weeds about but there isn't enough time in the day. I wanted so badly for this company to be everything it displayed and conveyed itself as but that's wildly far from reality. It's been incredibly disheartening to discover this "mental health" company is just another tech company with an incredibly talented marketing team.

1.0
Apr 11, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The Mission: Wanting to help end suicide and promoting mental health for at risk youth and now adults up to age 50.

Cons

The mission of this company is compelling on the surface, but unfortunately, the internal culture tells a very different story. Turnover among Clinical Outreach Managers is extremely high. Many have left or been let go due to unrealistic expectations and a lack of genuine support. Despite promoting mental health access externally, the company fails to support the well-being of its own employees. The work environment is marked by favoritism, fear-based management, and a lack of psychological safety. Inconsistent support across regions leads to inequities in resources and outcomes. Some territories are better equipped with more clinical staff, broader treatment options, and more payer sources, while others are expected to hit the same metrics without comparable support. Leadership is aware of these discrepancies but does little to address them, instead telling employees to “make it work” regardless of structural challenges. The handling of parental leave and caregiver needs is particularly troubling. Requests for flexibility are often denied, and efforts to be transparent about challenges are met with performative empathy that does not translate into real accommodation. Promises are made—but not followed through. Terminations without warning or performance plans are not uncommon. For a company that positions itself as a leader in mental health, it is concerning how little care is extended to the workforce tasked with delivering on that mission.

1.0
Jul 14, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The ability to work from home

Cons

Pay is low. Expectations are too high and often unrealistic. No work-life-balance. For instance, my work hours are from 12:00pm - 8:00pm. They have expectations that will not be accomplished within that timeframe, so I must start work early or leave work late in order to satisfy basic expectations. On a day where they are pleased with my performance, I am starting at 10:00am and finishing at 9:00pm. To do my job entirely I must work 11hr days. If I hold firmly to my boundaries, my work goes unfinished and many different departments are complaining to me at once. They tell you not to work outside your hours, but in the same breath they are wondering why phone calls and emails go unanswered, and why documentation is late. To achieve their expectations in the allotted time you must be ready to put all your time and energy into this job. If you’re ready to put in that level of effort then you will do well and will possibly have a management role in your future. I do not consider myself a lazy worker, but as a therapist, I must put the job away at some point to manage my own sanity. With this job I am not afforded the luxury to set it aside. I must live it. I’m not a person who wants to live my job, but if you are, then you’ll probably do well here. Some people enjoy that intensity. To each their own. In addition, a lot of the clients are unfit for the program. Based off of talking to my caseload I am getting the feels that Charlie health is soliciting clients. I have some clients who have no mental health issues whatsoever and they are being told by their pediatrician or PCP that they should look into Charlie Health. On the other end, I have high acuity clients who need residential treatment or who have complex issues that cannot be treated in a virtual IOP program. Does Charlie Health care? No! They have a more-the-merrier concept to treatment. Why wouldn’t they? They are a tech company masquerading as a mental health organization.

Viewing 19 - 21 of 418 Reviews

Glassdoor has 508 Charlie Health reviews submitted anonymously by Charlie Health employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Charlie Health is right for you.