Pros
Employees are generally friendly Some offices are in good condition
Cons
Work is not based in evidence Administration lacks accountability, quick to throw you under the bus Inconsistent direction from Administration Everything is very "silo" oriented, especially between medical and non-medical services. Most staff and managers have just given up, pass the time gossiping Many staff are protected by the union and stay employed despite failing to perform Rules change daily in some departments No orientation to the organization or the work, very sink or swim Very strict dress code Technology is severely outdated at most locations Continues to apply for grants without thought of where staff will have space, once you are hired you are on your own Lack of energy spent on strategic planning, implementation, and quality assurance Sites/Programs are not given equal support or attention Leadership likes to say they are open and progressive but it is not reflected in the programs, services, or hiring practices Employees are not culturally competent to support the communities they are targeting with grant funds Providers are not given the tools they need to succeed, many are not competent and many make repeated clinic errors without any consequences. Wealth distribution across positions is poor.
